"Whoever invented double clicking should be shot in the head! Twice!"
About this Quote
Violence is doing punchline work here, not policy. Craig Bruce’s line takes a petty, familiar irritation - the double-click, that tiny timing test that turns computers into scolding schoolmasters - and yanks it into the register of overkill. The gag is the escalation: “shot in the head” is already absurdly disproportionate; “Twice!” turns the sentence into a grim little echo of the very action he’s cursing. The complaint performs its own double-click, delivering the second hit as a rhythmic kicker and a neat bit of self-referential spite.
The specific intent is catharsis: to translate a low-stakes friction into a high-stakes fantasy, so the reader can laugh at the mismatch and recognize the feeling without endorsing the literal threat. The subtext is older than any operating system: interfaces demand that humans adapt to machines, then shame us when we fail the machine’s private rules. Double-clicking is infamous because it’s arbitrary and exclusionary - you have to learn a speed window that differs by device, by settings, by motor control, by age. It’s a “simple” gesture that quietly punishes variability.
Context matters: this is a writer’s complaint, shaped like a one-liner, from the era when desktop computing trained millions into mouse choreography. It’s office humor with teeth, aimed less at a person than at a design philosophy that mistakes habituation for elegance. The line endures because it nails how modern annoyance works: you’re not furious at the click; you’re furious at being made to feel incompetent by something built to be “user-friendly.”
The specific intent is catharsis: to translate a low-stakes friction into a high-stakes fantasy, so the reader can laugh at the mismatch and recognize the feeling without endorsing the literal threat. The subtext is older than any operating system: interfaces demand that humans adapt to machines, then shame us when we fail the machine’s private rules. Double-clicking is infamous because it’s arbitrary and exclusionary - you have to learn a speed window that differs by device, by settings, by motor control, by age. It’s a “simple” gesture that quietly punishes variability.
Context matters: this is a writer’s complaint, shaped like a one-liner, from the era when desktop computing trained millions into mouse choreography. It’s office humor with teeth, aimed less at a person than at a design philosophy that mistakes habituation for elegance. The line endures because it nails how modern annoyance works: you’re not furious at the click; you’re furious at being made to feel incompetent by something built to be “user-friendly.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Dark Humor |
|---|
More Quotes by Craig
Add to List









