"Why are comedic parts for women the exception, not the rule?"
About this Quote
The sting is in “the exception, not the rule.” Clarkson isn’t asking why there aren’t more opportunities; she’s asking why scarcity is treated as natural law. It flips the burden of proof onto the industry: the default setting is male, and everything else is a special request. That’s a structural critique disguised as a simple question, which is why it travels so well. It invites agreement from anyone who’s ever noticed the “funny friend” role skew male, the romantic lead role skew female, and the older-woman role skew toward martyrdom or menace.
Context matters: Clarkson’s career has lived in the space between prestige drama and indie character work, where women often get “serious” parts that signal importance but narrow the emotional palette. Her line pushes back against the idea that gravitas is the highest form of legitimacy for actresses. It argues, slyly, that comedy is not lightweight; it’s power, and women are routinely cast as if they can’t be trusted with it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Clarkson, Patricia. (2026, January 16). Why are comedic parts for women the exception, not the rule? FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-are-comedic-parts-for-women-the-exception-not-93800/
Chicago Style
Clarkson, Patricia. "Why are comedic parts for women the exception, not the rule?" FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-are-comedic-parts-for-women-the-exception-not-93800/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Why are comedic parts for women the exception, not the rule?" FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-are-comedic-parts-for-women-the-exception-not-93800/. Accessed 22 Feb. 2026.






