"Why are ecologists and environmentalists so feared and hated? This is because in part what they have to say is new to the general public, and the new is always alarming"
About this Quote
Hardin is doing something sly here: he reframes hostility toward environmentalism as a predictable psychological reflex rather than an argument worth engaging. “Feared and hated” is deliberately overheated language, less diagnosis than provocation. It casts ecologists as bearers of an unwelcome message, and the public as skittish, defensive, and a little irrational. The move is strategic. If opposition can be written off as fear of the unfamiliar, then environmentalists don’t need to win every policy debate on the merits; they need to outlast the panic phase of encountering “the new.”
The subtext is also an absolution and a warning. It absolves the movement from responsibility for being unpopular: people aren’t rejecting the content, they’re rejecting its novelty. At the same time, it warns that environmental ideas threaten settled routines and economic assumptions, so backlash is not incidental but structurally baked in. Hardin’s “in part” matters; he leaves room for other motives (profits, politics, identity) without naming them, which keeps the sentence clean and portable.
Context sharpens the edge. Hardin’s career sits in the late-20th-century moment when environmentalism shifted from conservation-as-hobby to ecology-as-constraint: limits, carrying capacity, externalities, population pressure. His broader work, especially “The Tragedy of the Commons,” often weaponized “realism” against sentimental politics. This quote carries that same posture: the public isn’t just uninformed, it’s alarmed by truths that imply sacrifice. The line works because it flatters the speaker as a brave messenger while nudging the audience to see their own discomfort as evidence, not rebuttal.
The subtext is also an absolution and a warning. It absolves the movement from responsibility for being unpopular: people aren’t rejecting the content, they’re rejecting its novelty. At the same time, it warns that environmental ideas threaten settled routines and economic assumptions, so backlash is not incidental but structurally baked in. Hardin’s “in part” matters; he leaves room for other motives (profits, politics, identity) without naming them, which keeps the sentence clean and portable.
Context sharpens the edge. Hardin’s career sits in the late-20th-century moment when environmentalism shifted from conservation-as-hobby to ecology-as-constraint: limits, carrying capacity, externalities, population pressure. His broader work, especially “The Tragedy of the Commons,” often weaponized “realism” against sentimental politics. This quote carries that same posture: the public isn’t just uninformed, it’s alarmed by truths that imply sacrifice. The line works because it flatters the speaker as a brave messenger while nudging the audience to see their own discomfort as evidence, not rebuttal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|
More Quotes by Garrett
Add to List