"Why are people unemployed? Because there is no work. Why is there no work? Because people are not buying products and services. Why are people not buying products and services? Because they have no money. Why do people have no money? Because they are unemployed"
About this Quote
Bruce builds a trap out of plainspoken logic: a recession as a closed loop, a snake eating its own tail. The power isn’t in originality (anyone who’s lived through a downturn recognizes the pattern) but in how the repetition mimics the experience of economic stagnation. Each “Why” pretends we’re moving toward a root cause; instead, we keep arriving back at the same human fact: people can’t spend because they can’t earn, and they can’t earn because no one spends. It’s a rhetorical treadmill that makes frustration feel inevitable.
The specific intent reads as a jab at simplistic, moralizing explanations for unemployment. Rather than treating joblessness as personal failure or laziness, Bruce frames it as a system-level coordination problem: demand collapses, businesses pull back, workers lose income, demand collapses again. The subtext is quietly political. If the problem is circular, the solution can’t be individual “responsibility” alone; it requires an outside force to break the loop, whether that’s public spending, credit expansion, wage support, or some other intervention that injects purchasing power.
Context matters, too. Coming from a contemporary writer (not an economist), the quote functions like a street-level Keynesianism: intuitive, impatient with technocratic obfuscation, designed to be repeated. It turns macroeconomics into a conversational chain, making a structural critique feel like common sense. The punch is that the “reason” is never a single villain; it’s the system’s feedback mechanism doing exactly what it does, until someone interrupts it.
The specific intent reads as a jab at simplistic, moralizing explanations for unemployment. Rather than treating joblessness as personal failure or laziness, Bruce frames it as a system-level coordination problem: demand collapses, businesses pull back, workers lose income, demand collapses again. The subtext is quietly political. If the problem is circular, the solution can’t be individual “responsibility” alone; it requires an outside force to break the loop, whether that’s public spending, credit expansion, wage support, or some other intervention that injects purchasing power.
Context matters, too. Coming from a contemporary writer (not an economist), the quote functions like a street-level Keynesianism: intuitive, impatient with technocratic obfuscation, designed to be repeated. It turns macroeconomics into a conversational chain, making a structural critique feel like common sense. The punch is that the “reason” is never a single villain; it’s the system’s feedback mechanism doing exactly what it does, until someone interrupts it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Craig
Add to List





