"Why didn't we recognize how much it bothered them spiritually and politically?"
About this Quote
"Recognize" signals a failure of perception, not empathy. It suggests the evidence was visible, even obvious, but filtered out by newsroom priors: economic indicators over lived humiliation, institutional stability over existential dread. Matthews’s pairing of "spiritually and politically" is the tell. It maps anger onto two axes at once: not just "they lost jobs" but "they lost a story about themselves". The spiritual register evokes culture-war injury - the sense that the country’s moral center has been relocated without consent. The political register acknowledges that this injury had an engine: parties, media ecosystems, and candidates willing to convert metaphysical grievance into votes.
The subtext is also protective: "them" sits at a distance, implying a bloc that could be studied, not a public that includes the speaker. It’s the classic post-upheaval cable-news reckoning, where astonishment performs humility while sidestepping the deeper question: what did "we" gain by not recognizing it sooner? Because denial wasn’t only an oversight; it was convenient until it wasn’t.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Matthews, Chris. (2026, January 17). Why didn't we recognize how much it bothered them spiritually and politically? FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-didnt-we-recognize-how-much-it-bothered-them-76114/
Chicago Style
Matthews, Chris. "Why didn't we recognize how much it bothered them spiritually and politically?" FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-didnt-we-recognize-how-much-it-bothered-them-76114/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Why didn't we recognize how much it bothered them spiritually and politically?" FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-didnt-we-recognize-how-much-it-bothered-them-76114/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.







