"Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?"
About this Quote
The question is also a quiet indictment of what American “strength” has been trained to look like. Guns are socially sanctioned props that let men be intimate with one another without vulnerability: you can stand shoulder to shoulder, you can trust, you can protect, you can even die together - as long as the relationship is framed through violence. Holding hands, by contrast, is nakedly human. It suggests tenderness without a cover story.
Coming from Gaines, a writer who chronicled Black life in Louisiana with unsentimental clarity, the subtext sharpens. This is a culture where male bodies - especially Black male bodies - are routinely read through threat and force, and where public displays of affection can be treated as provocation. The line doesn’t just critique homophobia; it exposes a broader American bargain: we’ll normalize weapons before we normalize softness, because softness demands we rethink who gets to be safe, and who gets to be seen as fully human.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Gaines, Ernest. (2026, January 16). Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands? FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-is-it-that-as-a-culture-we-are-more-126092/
Chicago Style
Gaines, Ernest. "Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?" FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-is-it-that-as-a-culture-we-are-more-126092/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?" FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-is-it-that-as-a-culture-we-are-more-126092/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.







