"Why is it that right-wing bastards always stand shoulder to shoulder in solidarity, while liberals fall out among themselves?"
About this Quote
The insult (“bastards”) isn’t decorative. It signals moral clarity without offering a comforting solution. He’s implying that outrage alone doesn’t organize; it can even fragment. The subtext is a critique of the liberal self-image: if you pride yourself on nuance, dissent, and individual conscience, you also inherit the chronic weakness of coordination. Liberalism’s virtues become its vulnerabilities in moments when politics turns into a contact sport.
Context matters: Yevtushenko wrote from inside the Soviet and post-Soviet century, where ideological camps were not abstract and the costs of disunity could be existential. For a poet who navigated state power, thaw-era hope, and backlash, solidarity isn’t a feel-good slogan; it’s the difference between being heard and being erased. The quote is a dare to liberals: keep your scruples, but learn the right’s talent for unity, or watch your principles lose on procedural grounds.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Yevtushenko, Yevgeny. (2026, January 14). Why is it that right-wing bastards always stand shoulder to shoulder in solidarity, while liberals fall out among themselves? FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-is-it-that-right-wing-bastards-always-stand-129605/
Chicago Style
Yevtushenko, Yevgeny. "Why is it that right-wing bastards always stand shoulder to shoulder in solidarity, while liberals fall out among themselves?" FixQuotes. January 14, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-is-it-that-right-wing-bastards-always-stand-129605/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Why is it that right-wing bastards always stand shoulder to shoulder in solidarity, while liberals fall out among themselves?" FixQuotes, 14 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/why-is-it-that-right-wing-bastards-always-stand-129605/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.





