"Will minus intellect constitutes vulgarity"
About this Quote
Schopenhauer’s insult lands because it flips the usual moral hierarchy. We tend to treat “will” as admirable grit: desire, drive, the engine of achievement. He frames it as potentially trashy. Strip will of intellect and you get vulgarity: not just bad manners, but a brutish mode of being where appetite outruns understanding.
The subtext is pure Schopenhauer. In his system, the Will is the blind, ceaseless force behind life itself, the reason humans lunge after status, sex, money, revenge. Left unchecked, it doesn’t make you “authentic”; it makes you noisy. Intellect, by contrast, isn’t mere IQ flexing. It’s the distancing mechanism that allows reflection, taste, restraint, and the ability to see beyond one’s immediate cravings. Vulgarity, then, is not a class slur so much as a metaphysical diagnosis: a person ruled by impulse becomes a walking advertisement for nature’s indifferent churn.
The line also carries a cultural jab at the 19th-century bourgeois world Schopenhauer despised: public respectability paired with private greed, earnest self-assertion without self-knowledge. “Will minus intellect” describes the go-getter who mistakes force for depth, conviction for clarity, appetite for right.
Why it works: it’s a compact equation that turns a social judgment into a philosophical one. It doesn’t argue; it categorizes. You can feel the icy certainty of a thinker who saw most human striving as a problem, not a virtue.
The subtext is pure Schopenhauer. In his system, the Will is the blind, ceaseless force behind life itself, the reason humans lunge after status, sex, money, revenge. Left unchecked, it doesn’t make you “authentic”; it makes you noisy. Intellect, by contrast, isn’t mere IQ flexing. It’s the distancing mechanism that allows reflection, taste, restraint, and the ability to see beyond one’s immediate cravings. Vulgarity, then, is not a class slur so much as a metaphysical diagnosis: a person ruled by impulse becomes a walking advertisement for nature’s indifferent churn.
The line also carries a cultural jab at the 19th-century bourgeois world Schopenhauer despised: public respectability paired with private greed, earnest self-assertion without self-knowledge. “Will minus intellect” describes the go-getter who mistakes force for depth, conviction for clarity, appetite for right.
Why it works: it’s a compact equation that turns a social judgment into a philosophical one. It doesn’t argue; it categorizes. You can feel the icy certainty of a thinker who saw most human striving as a problem, not a virtue.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List
