"Will power is to the mind like a strong blind man who carries on his shoulders a lame man who can see"
About this Quote
Schopenhauer’s image is cruelly efficient: the mind is not a unified, noble captain but a mismatched duo forced into cooperation. Will power, the “strong blind man,” supplies brute force and stamina, but it can’t see where it’s going. Intellect, the “lame man who can see,” has perception and direction, but lacks the ability to move on its own. Put them together and you get human behavior as Schopenhauer wants you to see it: driven less by enlightened choice than by a muscular, half-ignorant propulsion, steered by a clever but physically dependent guide.
The subtext is an insult to the modern fantasy of rational self-mastery. Schopenhauer doesn’t deny that reason matters; he demotes it. The intellect is useful, even necessary, but fundamentally secondary: it rides. It advises. It rationalizes. It cannot, on its own, do the heavy lifting of desire, fear, appetite, and stubborn striving. That hierarchy is the point. What we call “will power” isn’t a moral trophy; it’s an engine, indifferent to whether the destination is admirable or disastrous.
Context matters because Schopenhauer is writing against the optimistic, system-building confidence of German Idealism. Where Hegel sees history as reason unfolding, Schopenhauer sees life as will grinding forward, with consciousness as a tactical instrument. The metaphor works because it makes agency feel both impressive and pathetic: yes, you can move mountains, but you might be carrying your own bad ideas there.
The subtext is an insult to the modern fantasy of rational self-mastery. Schopenhauer doesn’t deny that reason matters; he demotes it. The intellect is useful, even necessary, but fundamentally secondary: it rides. It advises. It rationalizes. It cannot, on its own, do the heavy lifting of desire, fear, appetite, and stubborn striving. That hierarchy is the point. What we call “will power” isn’t a moral trophy; it’s an engine, indifferent to whether the destination is admirable or disastrous.
Context matters because Schopenhauer is writing against the optimistic, system-building confidence of German Idealism. Where Hegel sees history as reason unfolding, Schopenhauer sees life as will grinding forward, with consciousness as a tactical instrument. The metaphor works because it makes agency feel both impressive and pathetic: yes, you can move mountains, but you might be carrying your own bad ideas there.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List











