"Will the industry outsource more? I think it depends on the client base"
About this Quote
A non-answer that’s also a tell: Gould’s line is the polished corporate way of admitting that “industry strategy” is often just client demand wearing a blazer. The question invites a macro prediction - will outsourcing keep rising? - but he pulls it back to the only lever executives reliably respond to: whoever pays the invoices. That pivot isn’t evasive so much as revealing. It frames outsourcing less as an ideological commitment to globalization or cost-cutting and more as a market service, a choice made on behalf of customers who want cheaper, faster, or more scalable work.
The subtext is accountability management. By locating the decision in the “client base,” Gould disperses responsibility: if jobs move offshore, it’s not management’s greed or a board’s spreadsheet fetish; it’s the market speaking. It’s also a subtle warning to employees and policymakers: you can’t regulate or shame your way out of this without changing incentives on the demand side.
Contextually, this kind of statement fits a late-20th/early-21st-century business environment where outsourcing has become normalized across sectors - from manufacturing to IT services to back-office operations - and where companies are judged quarterly. Saying “it depends” signals prudence, but it also protects optionality: if clients prioritize price, outsourcing accelerates; if they prioritize security, quality control, or geopolitical stability, the calculus shifts.
What makes the line work is its strategic modesty. It sounds reasonable, even boring, while quietly recentering power: not labor, not governments, not even “the industry,” but the customer as the ultimate author of corporate decisions.
The subtext is accountability management. By locating the decision in the “client base,” Gould disperses responsibility: if jobs move offshore, it’s not management’s greed or a board’s spreadsheet fetish; it’s the market speaking. It’s also a subtle warning to employees and policymakers: you can’t regulate or shame your way out of this without changing incentives on the demand side.
Contextually, this kind of statement fits a late-20th/early-21st-century business environment where outsourcing has become normalized across sectors - from manufacturing to IT services to back-office operations - and where companies are judged quarterly. Saying “it depends” signals prudence, but it also protects optionality: if clients prioritize price, outsourcing accelerates; if they prioritize security, quality control, or geopolitical stability, the calculus shifts.
What makes the line work is its strategic modesty. It sounds reasonable, even boring, while quietly recentering power: not labor, not governments, not even “the industry,” but the customer as the ultimate author of corporate decisions.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|
More Quotes by Andrew
Add to List


