"Wisdom finds its literary expression in wisdom literature"
About this Quote
The apparently tautological remark carries a precise hermeneutic claim. Wisdom is not a free-floating essence that later gets dressed in words; it becomes intelligible as wisdom by taking shape in forms crafted for counsel, discernment, and character formation. Genre is not a neutral container. Proverbs, aphorisms, riddles, parables, and dialogues do work that treatises and proofs cannot. Their brevity, parallelism, and paradox teach by training judgment rather than by commanding assent, drawing readers into the slow apprenticeship of practical reasoning.
Ricoeur’s long engagement with biblical texts clarifies the point. What later editors call wisdom literature gathers voices as diverse as Proverbs, Job, and Ecclesiastes. Together they stage a polyphony rather than a system: the pedagogy of order and prudence, the protest against innocent suffering, the skepticism of vanity and impermanence. Such tensions are not failures to be resolved by a superior theory; they are the very medium through which wisdom is learned. Literature holds contradiction in play long enough for discernment to ripen. It addresses a reader who must decide, not by applying a formula, but by interpreting a situation.
This aligns with Ricoeur’s broader ideas about symbols, narrative, and the world in front of the text. Symbols give rise to thought; texts project possible ways of inhabiting the world. Wisdom literature names a set of literary procedures that open an ethical horizon and invite appropriation. Reading becomes a practice of formation, a passage from suspicion to a second naivete where one can affirm without being credulous.
The line therefore presses a methodological caution. To extract propositions from wisdom traditions while ignoring the forms that voice them is to lose the very thing one seeks. Practical reason survives by transmission, and transmission requires style, cadence, and communal address. To pursue wisdom, one must dwell in the genres that make it speak, letting their devices and dramas tutor the imagination and steady the will.
Ricoeur’s long engagement with biblical texts clarifies the point. What later editors call wisdom literature gathers voices as diverse as Proverbs, Job, and Ecclesiastes. Together they stage a polyphony rather than a system: the pedagogy of order and prudence, the protest against innocent suffering, the skepticism of vanity and impermanence. Such tensions are not failures to be resolved by a superior theory; they are the very medium through which wisdom is learned. Literature holds contradiction in play long enough for discernment to ripen. It addresses a reader who must decide, not by applying a formula, but by interpreting a situation.
This aligns with Ricoeur’s broader ideas about symbols, narrative, and the world in front of the text. Symbols give rise to thought; texts project possible ways of inhabiting the world. Wisdom literature names a set of literary procedures that open an ethical horizon and invite appropriation. Reading becomes a practice of formation, a passage from suspicion to a second naivete where one can affirm without being credulous.
The line therefore presses a methodological caution. To extract propositions from wisdom traditions while ignoring the forms that voice them is to lose the very thing one seeks. Practical reason survives by transmission, and transmission requires style, cadence, and communal address. To pursue wisdom, one must dwell in the genres that make it speak, letting their devices and dramas tutor the imagination and steady the will.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List
