"With artists of my own generation there was at first no group identity - and never a clique"
About this Quote
Noland is quietly swatting away one of the art world’s favorite myths: the idea that great work only happens inside a neatly branded “movement,” complete with a manifesto and a tight social circle. Coming of age in the postwar American scene, he lived through the period critics later packaged as a series of teams - Abstract Expressionists, then Color Field, then “Washington Color School.” His line resists that retrospective tidying. “At first” matters: it points to a formative moment before labels hardened, when artists were still improvising lives and methods rather than auditioning for art history.
The second clause sharpens the blade. “Never a clique” isn’t just sociological; it’s aesthetic self-defense. A clique implies consensus, gatekeeping, a shared style enforced by proximity and politics. Noland’s work - targets, chevrons, stained color that insists on optical experience over narrative - depends on the viewer believing in an individual, almost impersonal pursuit: paint and perception, not allegiance. He’s also distancing himself from the romantic drama of the New York scene, where personality could become part of the product.
There’s a strategic modesty here, too. By denying a “group identity,” Noland claims independence while still acknowledging a generational cohort. It’s a way to accept influence without surrendering authorship, to say: we were in the same weather system, but no one was wearing the same uniform. The subtext is about freedom - from critics’ categories, from marketable factions, from the suspicion that art is just social networking with better lighting.
The second clause sharpens the blade. “Never a clique” isn’t just sociological; it’s aesthetic self-defense. A clique implies consensus, gatekeeping, a shared style enforced by proximity and politics. Noland’s work - targets, chevrons, stained color that insists on optical experience over narrative - depends on the viewer believing in an individual, almost impersonal pursuit: paint and perception, not allegiance. He’s also distancing himself from the romantic drama of the New York scene, where personality could become part of the product.
There’s a strategic modesty here, too. By denying a “group identity,” Noland claims independence while still acknowledging a generational cohort. It’s a way to accept influence without surrendering authorship, to say: we were in the same weather system, but no one was wearing the same uniform. The subtext is about freedom - from critics’ categories, from marketable factions, from the suspicion that art is just social networking with better lighting.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kenneth
Add to List




