"With both Caddyshack and Vacation, it's not like the subjects were serious enough that they engaged my interest for another round. I love the characters, and the actors were great, but I didn't see the need to make another Vacation movie"
About this Quote
Ramis is doing that very Harold Ramis thing: sounding casual while delivering a quiet manifesto about comedy and commerce. He’s not trashing Caddyshack or Vacation; he’s protecting them. The line draws a firm boundary between affection and obligation, a distinction Hollywood loves to blur when a recognizable title can be turned into a “franchise” with a straight face.
The phrasing matters. “Not like the subjects were serious enough” isn’t a dismissal of comedy as lightweight so much as an argument that these films were built on a particular kind of spark: a moment, a cast, a tone, a loose-limbed irreverence that doesn’t naturally deepen with sequels. Ramis is pointing at the problem sequels try to solve - narrative continuation - and saying the original joke didn’t come with a built-in next chapter. Comedy, especially his brand, thrives on surprise and specificity. “Another round” is telling: he frames repetition as a bar trick, not an artistic challenge.
There’s also a subtle ethics here. “I love the characters” concedes the emotional pull audiences feel, but “I didn’t see the need” rejects nostalgia as sufficient justification. In a culture that treats IP like real estate, Ramis offers a contrarian standard: need. Not “can we?” or “will it sell?” but “why are we doing this at all?” Coming from an actor-writer-director who helped define studio comedy, it reads less like snobbery than a veteran’s skepticism about reheating what worked once and calling it new.
The phrasing matters. “Not like the subjects were serious enough” isn’t a dismissal of comedy as lightweight so much as an argument that these films were built on a particular kind of spark: a moment, a cast, a tone, a loose-limbed irreverence that doesn’t naturally deepen with sequels. Ramis is pointing at the problem sequels try to solve - narrative continuation - and saying the original joke didn’t come with a built-in next chapter. Comedy, especially his brand, thrives on surprise and specificity. “Another round” is telling: he frames repetition as a bar trick, not an artistic challenge.
There’s also a subtle ethics here. “I love the characters” concedes the emotional pull audiences feel, but “I didn’t see the need” rejects nostalgia as sufficient justification. In a culture that treats IP like real estate, Ramis offers a contrarian standard: need. Not “can we?” or “will it sell?” but “why are we doing this at all?” Coming from an actor-writer-director who helped define studio comedy, it reads less like snobbery than a veteran’s skepticism about reheating what worked once and calling it new.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Harold
Add to List


