"With each of those projects I wasn't thinking about how the layout would really affect the story I was working on - it wasn't the content that was affecting the layout, it was, how I wanted to draw at that point in time"
About this Quote
Brown is admitting something most artists practice and few confess: the work isn’t always led by “the story.” Sometimes it’s led by the hand.
On its face, he’s talking about layout choices in comics - panel size, pacing, the architecture of the page. But the subtext is a quiet rejection of the prestige idea that form must obediently serve narrative. Brown flips the usual hierarchy. The content wasn’t dictating the structure; his current drawing impulse was. That’s not laziness or formal ignorance. It’s an argument that comics are not just illustrated literature, but a physical, time-bound practice where the artist’s evolving instincts are part of the meaning.
The line “how I wanted to draw at that point in time” carries the real charge. It frames style as autobiography: each project becomes a record of aesthetic appetite, not just plot. That explains why his work can feel so controlled yet so idiosyncratic - the grid, the restraint, the deadpan rhythm. The layout becomes less a transparent window and more a signature gait.
Context matters because Brown emerges from a North American alt-comics tradition that prized formal experimentation and personal authorship over market polish. His admission echoes the ethos of cartoonists who treat the page like a lab, letting structure test emotion rather than merely package it. He’s also subtly pushing back against readers who demand coherence as a moral standard. Sometimes the clearest truth in a comic is simply: this is how my eye and hand moved then, and the story had to keep up.
On its face, he’s talking about layout choices in comics - panel size, pacing, the architecture of the page. But the subtext is a quiet rejection of the prestige idea that form must obediently serve narrative. Brown flips the usual hierarchy. The content wasn’t dictating the structure; his current drawing impulse was. That’s not laziness or formal ignorance. It’s an argument that comics are not just illustrated literature, but a physical, time-bound practice where the artist’s evolving instincts are part of the meaning.
The line “how I wanted to draw at that point in time” carries the real charge. It frames style as autobiography: each project becomes a record of aesthetic appetite, not just plot. That explains why his work can feel so controlled yet so idiosyncratic - the grid, the restraint, the deadpan rhythm. The layout becomes less a transparent window and more a signature gait.
Context matters because Brown emerges from a North American alt-comics tradition that prized formal experimentation and personal authorship over market polish. His admission echoes the ethos of cartoonists who treat the page like a lab, letting structure test emotion rather than merely package it. He’s also subtly pushing back against readers who demand coherence as a moral standard. Sometimes the clearest truth in a comic is simply: this is how my eye and hand moved then, and the story had to keep up.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Chester
Add to List

