"With me it was that defending the Communist Party was something worse than naming the names"
About this Quote
The intent is strategic. Dmytryk was one of the Hollywood Ten who initially refused to cooperate with HUAC, then later returned to testify and did name others. By claiming that defense was worse than informing, he offers a justification that tries to launder his reversal as principled rather than expedient. The subtext reads: I didn’t fold; I woke up. That’s the rhetorical move - not apologizing for collaboration, but presenting it as the lesser evil compared to clinging to a discredited cause.
The phrasing matters. “With me” narrows the claim into a personal moral calculus, a way to sound reflective while sidestepping collective accountability. “Something worse” is deliberately vague, letting listeners supply their own fears: Stalinism, subversion, disloyalty, naivete. In a culture where politics became a loyalty test staged for cameras, Dmytryk’s sentence isn’t just memory; it’s an audition for absolution.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Dmytryk, Edward. (2026, January 17). With me it was that defending the Communist Party was something worse than naming the names. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/with-me-it-was-that-defending-the-communist-party-50698/
Chicago Style
Dmytryk, Edward. "With me it was that defending the Communist Party was something worse than naming the names." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/with-me-it-was-that-defending-the-communist-party-50698/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"With me it was that defending the Communist Party was something worse than naming the names." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/with-me-it-was-that-defending-the-communist-party-50698/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.




