"With network shows, writers can be so protective of every syllable"
About this Quote
There is a quiet jab tucked inside Michael Shanks's observation: network TV runs on fear of waste. When he says writers are "so protective of every syllable", he is pointing to a system where dialogue is treated less like conversation and more like engineered product, calibrated to survive ad breaks, standards-and-practices notes, and the relentless math of ratings.
Shanks, as an actor, is implicitly defending the messy human stuff performers traffic in: breath, timing, the tiny improvisational pivots that make a line feel lived-in. Network shows often don’t reward that looseness. They reward clarity, speed, and plot delivery, because the viewer might be folding laundry, the episode might need to reset for next week, and the story has to land even if you missed a scene. In that environment, each word becomes a load-bearing beam. Change one syllable and you risk shifting continuity, character intention, or the precise breadcrumb trail that keeps audiences from changing the channel.
The subtext is not just critique; it’s cultural archaeology. Network television was built as a mass medium, and mass media tends to distrust ambiguity. Writers guarding syllables can be a sign of craft and professionalism, but also of constraint: too many stakeholders, too little time, too little permission for actors to bring their own weather. Shanks is naming the tension between industrial storytelling and the actor’s desire for spontaneity, a tension that streaming-era “freedom” loves to brag it solved, even as it invents its own forms of control.
Shanks, as an actor, is implicitly defending the messy human stuff performers traffic in: breath, timing, the tiny improvisational pivots that make a line feel lived-in. Network shows often don’t reward that looseness. They reward clarity, speed, and plot delivery, because the viewer might be folding laundry, the episode might need to reset for next week, and the story has to land even if you missed a scene. In that environment, each word becomes a load-bearing beam. Change one syllable and you risk shifting continuity, character intention, or the precise breadcrumb trail that keeps audiences from changing the channel.
The subtext is not just critique; it’s cultural archaeology. Network television was built as a mass medium, and mass media tends to distrust ambiguity. Writers guarding syllables can be a sign of craft and professionalism, but also of constraint: too many stakeholders, too little time, too little permission for actors to bring their own weather. Shanks is naming the tension between industrial storytelling and the actor’s desire for spontaneity, a tension that streaming-era “freedom” loves to brag it solved, even as it invents its own forms of control.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List


