"With over 1 billion users and counting worldwide, the Internet has quickly become a critical place for individuals, business communities and governments to share and distribute information"
About this Quote
There is a politician’s tell in the opening move: “over 1 billion users and counting” isn’t just a statistic, it’s a mandate. Hayes frames the Internet as too big to ignore, a kind of demographic inevitability that makes any subsequent policy stance sound like common sense rather than ideology. The phrase “quickly become” compresses a messy technological revolution into a neat timeline, implying that government can still catch up if it acts now. Urgency without panic: a classic legislative pitch.
The careful triad - “individuals, business communities and governments” - is doing coalition work. It flattens conflicting interests into a single, harmonious public square, where everyone is supposedly there for the same reason: “share and distribute information.” That verb choice is tellingly neutral. It sidesteps the Internet’s sharper edges - surveillance, monopolies, propaganda, harassment - and instead presents the network as an infrastructure of civic benefit, like roads or electricity. Once you accept that framing, regulation (or investment, or expanded authority) becomes easier to justify as “critical” maintenance of the commons.
Context matters: a mid-2000s-era political consensus treated the Internet as both economic engine and national-security frontier, before today’s more cynical vocabulary hardened around platform power and algorithmic manipulation. Hayes’s language belongs to that optimism-with-strings-attached moment, where celebrating connectivity also quietly positions the state as a legitimate stakeholder in the flow of information. The subtext is not “the Internet is amazing,” but “the Internet is strategic,” and whoever governs it governs a chunk of modern life.
The careful triad - “individuals, business communities and governments” - is doing coalition work. It flattens conflicting interests into a single, harmonious public square, where everyone is supposedly there for the same reason: “share and distribute information.” That verb choice is tellingly neutral. It sidesteps the Internet’s sharper edges - surveillance, monopolies, propaganda, harassment - and instead presents the network as an infrastructure of civic benefit, like roads or electricity. Once you accept that framing, regulation (or investment, or expanded authority) becomes easier to justify as “critical” maintenance of the commons.
Context matters: a mid-2000s-era political consensus treated the Internet as both economic engine and national-security frontier, before today’s more cynical vocabulary hardened around platform power and algorithmic manipulation. Hayes’s language belongs to that optimism-with-strings-attached moment, where celebrating connectivity also quietly positions the state as a legitimate stakeholder in the flow of information. The subtext is not “the Internet is amazing,” but “the Internet is strategic,” and whoever governs it governs a chunk of modern life.
Quote Details
| Topic | Internet |
|---|
More Quotes by Robin
Add to List
