"With people of limited ability modesty is merely honesty. But with those who possess great talent it is hypocrisy"
About this Quote
Schopenhauer comes in with a compliment that turns into a trap. He starts by granting “modesty” a clean moral purpose for the untalented: it’s just accurate self-reporting, the social equivalent of reading your own resume aloud and not lying. Then he pivots and makes modesty, in the mouths of the gifted, a kind of fraud. The sting is in that word “merely” paired with “honesty”: modesty is demoted from virtue to bookkeeping. Once talent enters the room, he implies, the same posture becomes performance.
The subtext is less about manners than about power. Modesty is a social technology that manages envy. If you’re exceptional, Schopenhauer suggests, downplaying it isn’t humility; it’s an attempt to keep your advantages while avoiding the consequences of being seen clearly. Hypocrisy here isn’t simple falsehood, but strategic self-erasure: the talented person pretending not to know what everyone else can feel. It’s an accusation aimed at the salon and the academy, where status depends on appearing above status-seeking.
Context matters: Schopenhauer wrote in a 19th-century intellectual culture obsessed with reputation, rank, and “genius,” while he himself cultivated the image of the snarling outsider. The line doubles as philosophy and personal grievance: a worldview where human social life is competition dressed up as virtue. It works because it collapses a comforting moral category (modesty) into a diagnostic tool: ask not whether someone is humble, but whether their humility is plausible.
The subtext is less about manners than about power. Modesty is a social technology that manages envy. If you’re exceptional, Schopenhauer suggests, downplaying it isn’t humility; it’s an attempt to keep your advantages while avoiding the consequences of being seen clearly. Hypocrisy here isn’t simple falsehood, but strategic self-erasure: the talented person pretending not to know what everyone else can feel. It’s an accusation aimed at the salon and the academy, where status depends on appearing above status-seeking.
Context matters: Schopenhauer wrote in a 19th-century intellectual culture obsessed with reputation, rank, and “genius,” while he himself cultivated the image of the snarling outsider. The line doubles as philosophy and personal grievance: a worldview where human social life is competition dressed up as virtue. It works because it collapses a comforting moral category (modesty) into a diagnostic tool: ask not whether someone is humble, but whether their humility is plausible.
Quote Details
| Topic | Humility |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List






