"Words can have no single fixed meaning. Like wayward electrons, they can spin away from their initial orbit and enter a wider magnetic field. No one owns them or has a proprietary right to dictate how they will be used"
About this Quote
Lehman treats language less like property and more like weather: it moves, it swirls, it refuses to stay where anyone pins it. The electron metaphor is doing tactical work here. It borrows the prestige of science to argue for uncertainty, but it also smuggles in a moral: if meaning is inherently mobile, then policing it is not just futile, it is a category error. Words, in this view, don’t “belong” to institutions, dictionaries, or even authors; they behave like particles in a field of competing forces - history, slang, translation, trauma, advertising, the internet.
The subtext lands squarely in contemporary fights over who gets to define terms (“woke,” “freedom,” “woman,” “genocide,” “terrorist”), and whether language can be stabilized by authority. Lehman’s poet’s instinct is to distrust any regime of fixed meanings because poetry itself survives on drift: connotation over denotation, echo over certainty. When he says “no one owns them,” he’s pushing back against both corporate trademark logic and cultural gatekeeping. There’s a quiet jab at the idea of “proprietary rights” over speech - the legal and ideological impulse to treat words as fenced-off real estate.
Contextually, Lehman emerges from a late-20th-century literary ecosystem steeped in post-structuralism and the democratization of voice: meaning is negotiated, not delivered from on high. The line’s power is its double edge. It liberates language for invention and reinterpretation, while also admitting the darker corollary: if no one owns words, no one can fully control the damage they do when they “spin away” into propaganda, euphemism, or hate.
The subtext lands squarely in contemporary fights over who gets to define terms (“woke,” “freedom,” “woman,” “genocide,” “terrorist”), and whether language can be stabilized by authority. Lehman’s poet’s instinct is to distrust any regime of fixed meanings because poetry itself survives on drift: connotation over denotation, echo over certainty. When he says “no one owns them,” he’s pushing back against both corporate trademark logic and cultural gatekeeping. There’s a quiet jab at the idea of “proprietary rights” over speech - the legal and ideological impulse to treat words as fenced-off real estate.
Contextually, Lehman emerges from a late-20th-century literary ecosystem steeped in post-structuralism and the democratization of voice: meaning is negotiated, not delivered from on high. The line’s power is its double edge. It liberates language for invention and reinterpretation, while also admitting the darker corollary: if no one owns words, no one can fully control the damage they do when they “spin away” into propaganda, euphemism, or hate.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by David
Add to List
