Skip to main content

Life & Wisdom Quote by Samuel Johnson

"Worth seeing? Yes; but not worth going to see"

About this Quote

A perfect little scalpel of eighteenth-century taste: Johnson grants the work its due, then denies it your effort. The line is built on a petty-sounding distinction that turns out to be a full philosophy of judgment. “Worth seeing” concedes intrinsic merit; “not worth going to see” shifts the verdict to the economy of attention. It’s not that the thing is bad. It’s that your time, money, and inconvenience are better spent elsewhere. In an age when “going” to see meant carriages, crowds, social obligations, and an evening sacrificed, the second clause bites harder than it does today. Johnson is pricing culture.

The intent is conversational authority. Johnson, famously allergic to hype and cant, speaks as a critic who refuses to be bullied by fashion or social expectation. The yes is a feint of fairness; the but is the guillotine. That balance lets him sound reasonable while still delivering a dismissal you can repeat at dinner. It’s review-as-epigram: portable, quotable, socially useful.

Subtext: not all value is equal. Some art is best encountered accidentally, secondhand, or at low cost. Johnson isn’t only judging the object; he’s judging the surrounding spectacle of consumption. The quip also flatters the listener: you’re the sort of person whose attention is scarce enough to be managed.

In modern terms, it’s the original “stream it, don’t pay theater prices” - a reminder that cultural approval is not the same as cultural priority.

Quote Details

TopicWitty One-Liners
Source
Verified source: The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. (Samuel Johnson, 1791)
Text match: 95.56%   Provider: Cross-Reference
Evidence:
BOSWELL. 'Is not the Giant's-Causeway worth seeing?' JOHNSON. 'Worth seeing? yes; but not worth going to see.'. Primary-source earliest *published* appearance located: James Boswell’s biography *The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D.* (first published 16 May 1791, in two volumes). The line occurs as reported conversation in Boswell’s narrative about Johnson’s aversion to travelling to Ireland. The commonly-circulated variant “Worth seeing? Yes; but not worth going to see” matches Boswell’s wording closely, differing mainly in capitalization/punctuation and omission of the preceding question attribution. Project Gutenberg reproduces the text but is not itself the original publication; it is used here to verify exact wording. First-edition imprint details (Baldwin/Dilly, London, 1791) are corroborated by rare-book catalog/auction descriptions.
Other candidates (1)
The Life of Samuel Johnson (Boswell, 1874) compilation95.0%
... JOHNSON . " No , Sir , Dublin is only a worse capital . " BOSWELL . " Is not the Giant's - Causeway worth seeing ...
Cite

Citation Formats

APA Style (7th ed.)
Johnson, Samuel. (2026, February 28). Worth seeing? Yes; but not worth going to see. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/worth-seeing-yes-but-not-worth-going-to-see-21121/

Chicago Style
Johnson, Samuel. "Worth seeing? Yes; but not worth going to see." FixQuotes. February 28, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/worth-seeing-yes-but-not-worth-going-to-see-21121/.

MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Worth seeing? Yes; but not worth going to see." FixQuotes, 28 Feb. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/worth-seeing-yes-but-not-worth-going-to-see-21121/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2026.

More Quotes by Samuel Add to List
Samuel Johnson on Seeing: Worth Seeing, Not Worth Going
Click to enlarge Portrait | Landscape

About the Author

Samuel Johnson

Samuel Johnson (September 18, 1709 - December 13, 1784) was a Author from England.

151 more quotes available

View Profile

Similar Quotes

Georges Jacques Danton, Revolutionary
Georges Jacques Danton
Mary Chesnut, Author
Mary Chesnut