"Worth seeing? Yes; but not worth going to see"
About this Quote
The intent is conversational authority. Johnson, famously allergic to hype and cant, speaks as a critic who refuses to be bullied by fashion or social expectation. The yes is a feint of fairness; the but is the guillotine. That balance lets him sound reasonable while still delivering a dismissal you can repeat at dinner. It’s review-as-epigram: portable, quotable, socially useful.
Subtext: not all value is equal. Some art is best encountered accidentally, secondhand, or at low cost. Johnson isn’t only judging the object; he’s judging the surrounding spectacle of consumption. The quip also flatters the listener: you’re the sort of person whose attention is scarce enough to be managed.
In modern terms, it’s the original “stream it, don’t pay theater prices” - a reminder that cultural approval is not the same as cultural priority.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Johnson, Samuel. (2026, January 14). Worth seeing? Yes; but not worth going to see. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/worth-seeing-yes-but-not-worth-going-to-see-21121/
Chicago Style
Johnson, Samuel. "Worth seeing? Yes; but not worth going to see." FixQuotes. January 14, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/worth-seeing-yes-but-not-worth-going-to-see-21121/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Worth seeing? Yes; but not worth going to see." FixQuotes, 14 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/worth-seeing-yes-but-not-worth-going-to-see-21121/. Accessed 26 Feb. 2026.








