"Would Alexander, madman as he was, have been so much a madman, had it not been for Homer?"
About this Quote
The question form matters. Richardson isn’t delivering a sermon; he’s staging a provocation that sounds like common sense until it becomes unsettling. If Homer can intensify Alexander’s mania, then culture isn’t a passive mirror of heroism; it’s an accelerant. The subtext is about imitation: literature as a technology of desire that teaches readers what to want, what counts as greatness, and what collateral damage can be aestheticized away.
Context sharpens the critique. In an 18th-century Britain busy building its own empire and polishing its own literary canon, Richardson’s jab reads like a warning shot at the educated classes who treat antiquity as a moral upgrade. He’s asking whether the “great man” is actually a product of storytelling supply chains - and whether celebrating epic heroes is a way of laundering conquest into art.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Richardson, Samuel. (2026, January 18). Would Alexander, madman as he was, have been so much a madman, had it not been for Homer? FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/would-alexander-madman-as-he-was-have-been-so-11480/
Chicago Style
Richardson, Samuel. "Would Alexander, madman as he was, have been so much a madman, had it not been for Homer?" FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/would-alexander-madman-as-he-was-have-been-so-11480/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Would Alexander, madman as he was, have been so much a madman, had it not been for Homer?" FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/would-alexander-madman-as-he-was-have-been-so-11480/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.





