"Yeah, I think it's an absolute disaster that Australia, the government, allowed kangaroo culling"
About this Quote
Calling kangaroo culling an "absolute disaster" is classic Irwin: moral clarity delivered in plain, TV-ready language, with no patience for bureaucratic euphemism. The line isn’t built to win a policy seminar; it’s built to puncture the technocratic framing that usually surrounds wildlife management. By singling out "Australia, the government", he drags responsibility out of the fog of committee talk and pins it to an accountable actor. That’s the real move here: converting what officials might describe as "population control" into a failure of stewardship.
The specific intent is protective and accusatory. Irwin isn’t merely mourning animals; he’s challenging a national self-image. Australia sells itself as a place defined by distinctive wildlife, and kangaroos are the flagship symbol. Culling, especially when sanctioned by the state, reads as a kind of cultural hypocrisy: the country commodifies the icon on coins and tourism ads while treating the living animal as a nuisance to be liquidated.
Subtextually, Irwin is also defending a conservation ethic rooted in wonder and intimacy rather than spreadsheets. His public persona made animals legible as individuals, not units. That emotional translation is his power: he turns a management decision into something viewers can feel as loss, even betrayal. Context matters too: in Australia, kangaroo culls recur at the intersection of drought, grazing pressure, farming politics, and urban expansion. Irwin’s blunt condemnation pressures that whole system, implying that the real disaster isn’t overabundant kangaroos - it’s human land use demanding an easy, violent fix.
The specific intent is protective and accusatory. Irwin isn’t merely mourning animals; he’s challenging a national self-image. Australia sells itself as a place defined by distinctive wildlife, and kangaroos are the flagship symbol. Culling, especially when sanctioned by the state, reads as a kind of cultural hypocrisy: the country commodifies the icon on coins and tourism ads while treating the living animal as a nuisance to be liquidated.
Subtextually, Irwin is also defending a conservation ethic rooted in wonder and intimacy rather than spreadsheets. His public persona made animals legible as individuals, not units. That emotional translation is his power: he turns a management decision into something viewers can feel as loss, even betrayal. Context matters too: in Australia, kangaroo culls recur at the intersection of drought, grazing pressure, farming politics, and urban expansion. Irwin’s blunt condemnation pressures that whole system, implying that the real disaster isn’t overabundant kangaroos - it’s human land use demanding an easy, violent fix.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|
More Quotes by Steve
Add to List
