"Yes, it will go through the disciplines that all puppies go through including house training and puppy walking, then at twelve month old it the training becomes a lot more rigorous which has to be done carefully otherwise you are in danger of stressing the dog"
About this Quote
Blunkett’s line has the pleasantly bureaucratic feel of a man trying to make the strange sound routine. He’s talking about a dog, but he’s also performing politics: translating an emotionally loaded issue into a checklist of “disciplines,” timelines, and risk management. It’s the civil service voice of reassurance, meant to tell the public that nothing improvisational or indulgent is happening here - just a controlled process, with milestones.
The specific intent is calming and legitimizing. By invoking the universal rites of puppyhood (“house training,” “puppy walking”), he borrows the authority of the everyday. The subtext is: trust the system; we’ve done this before; the state can be a competent caregiver. Even the slightly clunky phrasing works in his favor, because it reads as unpolished practicality rather than spin.
Then comes the pivot: “at twelve month old… the training becomes a lot more rigorous.” That’s where the context sharpens. Blunkett, a high-profile blind politician associated with guide dogs, is speaking into a public conversation about assistance animals - not cute pets, but working bodies shaped by discipline. The warning about “stressing the dog” quietly signals both expertise and ethical caution: rigor is necessary, but cruelty (or even mere thoughtlessness) can ruin the outcome.
What makes the quote work is its double register. It domesticated a potentially contentious subject by framing it as patient training, while reminding listeners that public trust can be broken as easily as an overworked animal.
The specific intent is calming and legitimizing. By invoking the universal rites of puppyhood (“house training,” “puppy walking”), he borrows the authority of the everyday. The subtext is: trust the system; we’ve done this before; the state can be a competent caregiver. Even the slightly clunky phrasing works in his favor, because it reads as unpolished practicality rather than spin.
Then comes the pivot: “at twelve month old… the training becomes a lot more rigorous.” That’s where the context sharpens. Blunkett, a high-profile blind politician associated with guide dogs, is speaking into a public conversation about assistance animals - not cute pets, but working bodies shaped by discipline. The warning about “stressing the dog” quietly signals both expertise and ethical caution: rigor is necessary, but cruelty (or even mere thoughtlessness) can ruin the outcome.
What makes the quote work is its double register. It domesticated a potentially contentious subject by framing it as patient training, while reminding listeners that public trust can be broken as easily as an overworked animal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Dog |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List
