"Yes, we are all different. Different customs, different foods, different mannerisms, different languages, but not so different that we cannot get along with one another. If we will disagree without being disagreeable"
About this Quote
Kohe’s line reads like a gentle corrective to the mid-century fantasy that harmony requires sameness. He starts by stacking “different” in a quick, rhythmic inventory - customs, foods, mannerisms, languages - the everyday stuff people actually notice before they ever get to lofty ideals. That list is doing quiet psychological work: it normalizes difference as ordinary and sensory, not threatening. The repetition also anticipates a common defensive reaction (“too different to coexist”) and disarms it through sheer familiarity. You can almost hear the implied shrug: yes, obviously, we’re not identical.
The pivot - “but not so different” - carries the real intent. Kohe isn’t selling naive unity; he’s lowering the bar to a practical ethic. Getting along doesn’t require agreement, only a shared commitment to managing friction. That’s why the final clause is the sharpest: “disagree without being disagreeable.” It’s a behavioral standard, not a sentiment. The subtext is that conflict is inevitable in pluralistic societies; the variable we can control is tone, restraint, and basic respect. In psychologist terms, he’s shifting attention from identity to interaction: from what people are to how they behave when challenged.
Context matters: a psychologist writing in a century marked by world wars, civil rights struggles, and mass migration would be allergic to the way “difference” gets pathologized into division. Kohe’s sentence is a modest proposal for civic adulthood: keep your convictions, lose the contempt.
The pivot - “but not so different” - carries the real intent. Kohe isn’t selling naive unity; he’s lowering the bar to a practical ethic. Getting along doesn’t require agreement, only a shared commitment to managing friction. That’s why the final clause is the sharpest: “disagree without being disagreeable.” It’s a behavioral standard, not a sentiment. The subtext is that conflict is inevitable in pluralistic societies; the variable we can control is tone, restraint, and basic respect. In psychologist terms, he’s shifting attention from identity to interaction: from what people are to how they behave when challenged.
Context matters: a psychologist writing in a century marked by world wars, civil rights struggles, and mass migration would be allergic to the way “difference” gets pathologized into division. Kohe’s sentence is a modest proposal for civic adulthood: keep your convictions, lose the contempt.
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|
More Quotes by Martin Kohe
Add to List





