"You can be right or you can be happy"
About this Quote
A lot of misery is just courtroom theater staged inside a relationship. Gerald Jampolsky, writing as a psychologist steeped in humanistic and New Age-inflected therapy culture, compresses that dynamic into a line that sounds like folksy wisdom but lands like a dare: stop treating your life like a debate you have to win.
The intent isn’t anti-truth; it’s anti-compulsion. “Right” here means the need to secure moral high ground, to narrate yourself as the reasonable one while someone else becomes the defendant. Jampolsky is pointing at how quickly that reflex hijacks intimacy and even self-regard. Being “happy” isn’t presented as a prize you earn by proving your case; it’s framed as a choice that often requires dropping the brief, surrendering the fantasy that vindication will feel like peace.
The subtext is slightly unsettling: your suffering may be functional. Righteousness can be a steady supply of identity, certainty, and control. If you let go of being right, you don’t just lose an argument; you lose a story about who you are. That’s why the line works rhetorically: it forces a trade-off, and trade-offs expose priorities.
Context matters. Coming from a psychologist, it echoes a therapeutic emphasis on cognitive reframing and conflict de-escalation: ask what the fight is buying you, then decide if the purchase is worth it. It’s also a cultural artifact of an era that prized personal peace over ideological combat. The sneaky power of the quote is that it makes “happiness” sound less like a mood and more like an ethic.
The intent isn’t anti-truth; it’s anti-compulsion. “Right” here means the need to secure moral high ground, to narrate yourself as the reasonable one while someone else becomes the defendant. Jampolsky is pointing at how quickly that reflex hijacks intimacy and even self-regard. Being “happy” isn’t presented as a prize you earn by proving your case; it’s framed as a choice that often requires dropping the brief, surrendering the fantasy that vindication will feel like peace.
The subtext is slightly unsettling: your suffering may be functional. Righteousness can be a steady supply of identity, certainty, and control. If you let go of being right, you don’t just lose an argument; you lose a story about who you are. That’s why the line works rhetorically: it forces a trade-off, and trade-offs expose priorities.
Context matters. Coming from a psychologist, it echoes a therapeutic emphasis on cognitive reframing and conflict de-escalation: ask what the fight is buying you, then decide if the purchase is worth it. It’s also a cultural artifact of an era that prized personal peace over ideological combat. The sneaky power of the quote is that it makes “happiness” sound less like a mood and more like an ethic.
Quote Details
| Topic | Happiness |
|---|---|
| Source | Quote attributed to Gerald Jampolsky; listed on Wikiquote under 'Gerald Jampolsky' (common citation: his book Love Is Letting Go of Fear). |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Jampolsky, Gerald. (2026, January 14). You can be right or you can be happy. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/you-can-be-right-or-you-can-be-happy-79060/
Chicago Style
Jampolsky, Gerald. "You can be right or you can be happy." FixQuotes. January 14, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/you-can-be-right-or-you-can-be-happy-79060/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"You can be right or you can be happy." FixQuotes, 14 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/you-can-be-right-or-you-can-be-happy-79060/. Accessed 4 Feb. 2026.
More Quotes by Gerald
Add to List









