"You can have information and ease of use and have artistic integrity at the same time. The art of being a good Web designer is getting yourself into that middle ground and treating it as a final destination instead of as a compromise"
About this Quote
Davidson is pushing back on a tired binary that still haunts tech: that anything usable must be sterile, and anything expressive must be inconvenient. His phrasing is deliberately corrective. “You can have” reads like a rebuttal to a room full of people who’ve already internalized the tradeoff. The quiet provocation is that the tradeoff was never a law of nature; it was a habit, often justified by laziness, ego, or a fetish for novelty.
The key move is his redefinition of “middle ground.” In most creative industries, the middle is where passion goes to die: the place you end up after stakeholders sand off the edges. Davidson flips it. He insists that balance can be an artistic stance, not an apology. That’s a subtle but pointed critique of two tribes: designers who hide weak ideas behind “integrity,” and product teams that reduce design to frictionless throughput. He’s arguing for a third identity: the web designer as translator, someone who can make information feel inevitable and still make it feel like something.
Context matters: web design grew up under constraints (bandwidth, browsers, accessibility, templates, business goals). It’s also a medium where users arrive with intent, not reverence. Davidson’s line about treating the middle ground as a “final destination” is a demand for craft in that reality. Not “make it pretty after,” not “ship now, design later,” but build a coherent experience where clarity is part of the aesthetic. In other words: the highest ambition on the web isn’t purity. It’s precision.
The key move is his redefinition of “middle ground.” In most creative industries, the middle is where passion goes to die: the place you end up after stakeholders sand off the edges. Davidson flips it. He insists that balance can be an artistic stance, not an apology. That’s a subtle but pointed critique of two tribes: designers who hide weak ideas behind “integrity,” and product teams that reduce design to frictionless throughput. He’s arguing for a third identity: the web designer as translator, someone who can make information feel inevitable and still make it feel like something.
Context matters: web design grew up under constraints (bandwidth, browsers, accessibility, templates, business goals). It’s also a medium where users arrive with intent, not reverence. Davidson’s line about treating the middle ground as a “final destination” is a demand for craft in that reality. Not “make it pretty after,” not “ship now, design later,” but build a coherent experience where clarity is part of the aesthetic. In other words: the highest ambition on the web isn’t purity. It’s precision.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Mike
Add to List




