"You can't have too much of everything, you must have a balance, that's very important"
About this Quote
“You can’t have too much of everything” sounds like a paradox, but in a politician’s mouth it’s a pressure-release valve: a way to argue for restraint without naming the groups or appetites that need restraining. Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s line carries the calming cadence of governance-as-parenting, nudging a public toward moderation while sidestepping the messy question of who, exactly, must give something up.
Badawi came to power in Malaysia with a reformist, anti-corruption sheen after Mahathir’s long, hard-driving era. That context matters. “Balance” becomes a coded promise: less ideological heat, more administrative steadiness; less personality cult, more “good governance.” It also fits Malaysia’s perennial tightrope walk - rapid economic development alongside ethnic power-sharing, religious identity, and social stability. When he insists balance is “very important,” he’s not issuing a personal mantra so much as defending the state’s preferred operating system: incremental change, managed pluralism, controlled growth.
The subtext is a warning disguised as reassurance. Too much “everything” can mean too much liberalization, too much dissent, too much market frenzy, too much moral policing - whichever excess the listener already fears. That ambiguity is the feature. It lets the line travel across constituencies: business hears prudence, conservatives hear social order, reformists hear moderation after excess.
Rhetorically, it works because it feels commonsensical while being strategically noncommittal. “Balance” is a political virtue that almost no one opposes, and that’s precisely why leaders reach for it when the real argument is over who gets to define the scales.
Badawi came to power in Malaysia with a reformist, anti-corruption sheen after Mahathir’s long, hard-driving era. That context matters. “Balance” becomes a coded promise: less ideological heat, more administrative steadiness; less personality cult, more “good governance.” It also fits Malaysia’s perennial tightrope walk - rapid economic development alongside ethnic power-sharing, religious identity, and social stability. When he insists balance is “very important,” he’s not issuing a personal mantra so much as defending the state’s preferred operating system: incremental change, managed pluralism, controlled growth.
The subtext is a warning disguised as reassurance. Too much “everything” can mean too much liberalization, too much dissent, too much market frenzy, too much moral policing - whichever excess the listener already fears. That ambiguity is the feature. It lets the line travel across constituencies: business hears prudence, conservatives hear social order, reformists hear moderation after excess.
Rhetorically, it works because it feels commonsensical while being strategically noncommittal. “Balance” is a political virtue that almost no one opposes, and that’s precisely why leaders reach for it when the real argument is over who gets to define the scales.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Abdullah
Add to List









