"You couldn't take football away from me, you couldn't take acting away from me"
About this Quote
Scott's background makes the pairing especially loaded. A Scottish kid coming up in a culture where football is a local religion, he signals that sport wasn't a hobby; it was a formative language. Acting then becomes the second language that offered a different route out, one less tied to the pitch but still tied to performance, stamina, and nerves. The quote compresses an entire class and masculinity story: acceptable passion (football) beside the passion that can be read as softer or riskier (acting). By insisting both are untouchable, he rejects the idea that you must trade one kind of intensity for another.
There's subtext, too, about control. Actors live with constant rejection; athletes live with constant fragility. Scott frames both as things that can be threatened but not confiscated. It's not triumphal; it's protective. The line lands because it sounds like someone who has had to defend his passions aloud, to himself and to others, and decided the argument is over.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sports |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Scott, Dougray. (2026, January 15). You couldn't take football away from me, you couldn't take acting away from me. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/you-couldnt-take-football-away-from-me-you-143583/
Chicago Style
Scott, Dougray. "You couldn't take football away from me, you couldn't take acting away from me." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/you-couldnt-take-football-away-from-me-you-143583/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"You couldn't take football away from me, you couldn't take acting away from me." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/you-couldnt-take-football-away-from-me-you-143583/. Accessed 9 Feb. 2026.







