"You do have to change things as warfare changes"
About this Quote
Schumer’s line is the kind of plainspoken pragmatism that tries to sound like common sense and, in doing so, sneaks past the partisan tripwires. It’s a politician’s version of an update notification: the world has changed; your policies should, too. The genius (and the danger) is in how little it specifies. “Change things” is deliberately nonspecific enough to cover almost any agenda item, from updating surveillance authorities to reshaping military procurement, cybersecurity funding, or domestic counterterror measures. It’s an argument for flexibility that avoids naming what, exactly, must be surrendered or expanded.
The subtext is about permission. In American politics, especially post-9/11 and now in an era of drones, ransomware, disinformation campaigns, and gray-zone conflict, leaders often need rhetorical cover to revise old red lines: privacy norms, rules of engagement, even what counts as “warfare.” Schumer frames adaptation as inevitable rather than ideological, implying that resistance is not principled but outdated.
Context matters because “warfare” is no longer confined to foreign battlefields. It bleeds into infrastructure, elections, supply chains, and social media. By invoking warfare’s evolution, Schumer implicitly elevates these contested policy choices into a national-security register, where urgency compresses debate and trade-offs feel mandatory. The sentence works because it offers a sturdy, modern political alibi: don’t blame the lawmakers for the new architecture of power; blame the changing nature of the threat.
The subtext is about permission. In American politics, especially post-9/11 and now in an era of drones, ransomware, disinformation campaigns, and gray-zone conflict, leaders often need rhetorical cover to revise old red lines: privacy norms, rules of engagement, even what counts as “warfare.” Schumer frames adaptation as inevitable rather than ideological, implying that resistance is not principled but outdated.
Context matters because “warfare” is no longer confined to foreign battlefields. It bleeds into infrastructure, elections, supply chains, and social media. By invoking warfare’s evolution, Schumer implicitly elevates these contested policy choices into a national-security register, where urgency compresses debate and trade-offs feel mandatory. The sentence works because it offers a sturdy, modern political alibi: don’t blame the lawmakers for the new architecture of power; blame the changing nature of the threat.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List







