"You increase muscle bulk by training against resistance. For example, weights. And in ballet, this isn't the case"
About this Quote
Ballet lives in the awkward space where athletic reality collides with aesthetic mythology, and Deborah Bull is puncturing that collision with a dancer's pragmatism. She starts with a statement so blunt it borders on gym-brochure obvious: resistance builds muscle. Then she drops the hinge: "And in ballet, this isn't the case". The sentence is doing two jobs at once. On the surface, it's a technical claim about training method. Underneath, it's an indictment of how ballet wants bodies to look - long, "effortless", streamlined - while demanding grueling labor that absolutely should, by ordinary logic, bulk you up.
The intent feels corrective. Bull isn't romanticizing the art; she's demystifying the mechanism. That demystification carries subtext: ballet culture has historically treated strength as something you must possess without appearing to have built it. The dancer is required to be powerful but not muscular, resilient but not heavy, conditioned but not "gym-made". Her phrasing is almost clinical, which is the point: it exposes an industry preference as if it were a natural law, revealing how constructed it is.
Contextually, Bull speaks from inside an era when ballet companies were increasingly confronting sports science, injury prevention, and the politics of dancer bodies. Her aside "for example, weights" reads like a deliberately ordinary reference, grounding ballet in the same physical universe as everyone else - and making the art world's exception-making sound faintly absurd. The line lands because it treats the unspoken rule in ballet as what it is: not physiology, but taste.
The intent feels corrective. Bull isn't romanticizing the art; she's demystifying the mechanism. That demystification carries subtext: ballet culture has historically treated strength as something you must possess without appearing to have built it. The dancer is required to be powerful but not muscular, resilient but not heavy, conditioned but not "gym-made". Her phrasing is almost clinical, which is the point: it exposes an industry preference as if it were a natural law, revealing how constructed it is.
Contextually, Bull speaks from inside an era when ballet companies were increasingly confronting sports science, injury prevention, and the politics of dancer bodies. Her aside "for example, weights" reads like a deliberately ordinary reference, grounding ballet in the same physical universe as everyone else - and making the art world's exception-making sound faintly absurd. The line lands because it treats the unspoken rule in ballet as what it is: not physiology, but taste.
Quote Details
| Topic | Fitness |
|---|
More Quotes by Deborah
Add to List






