"You know, face painting in non-Western cultures is a sign of collectivism, is a sign of one representing the community, it's not unique at all"
About this Quote
Jarman’s line bristles with the impatience of a working artist watching a sacred practice get flattened into a Halloween accessory. He’s not merely pointing out a cultural difference; he’s rejecting the Western reflex to treat adornment as autobiography. In a pop culture that frames every aesthetic choice as personal branding, he repositions face painting as something closer to a social contract: you wear the marks of the group, and the group, in turn, can read you.
The phrasing matters. “You know” has the feel of a corrective aside, like he’s cutting through a familiar bad take mid-conversation. The repetition of “is a sign” gives it the cadence of explanation, but the last clause - “it’s not unique at all” - lands as a jab. Jarman isn’t praising collectivism in the abstract; he’s deflating the romance of uniqueness that often accompanies Western encounters with “non-Western” art, especially in avant-garde and countercultural scenes that borrow heavily while insisting on their own originality.
Contextually, Jarman’s world sits at the crossroads of Black experimental music, ritual performance, and the politics of representation. Face painting, stage dress, and ceremony in that space can be both aesthetic and ethical: a way of invoking lineage, community, and responsibility rather than individual spectacle. The subtext is a warning about appropriation’s favorite trick - keeping the surface, discarding the social meaning. Jarman insists the meaning is the point, and that the “self” Western audiences come looking for may be the wrong unit of analysis.
The phrasing matters. “You know” has the feel of a corrective aside, like he’s cutting through a familiar bad take mid-conversation. The repetition of “is a sign” gives it the cadence of explanation, but the last clause - “it’s not unique at all” - lands as a jab. Jarman isn’t praising collectivism in the abstract; he’s deflating the romance of uniqueness that often accompanies Western encounters with “non-Western” art, especially in avant-garde and countercultural scenes that borrow heavily while insisting on their own originality.
Contextually, Jarman’s world sits at the crossroads of Black experimental music, ritual performance, and the politics of representation. Face painting, stage dress, and ceremony in that space can be both aesthetic and ethical: a way of invoking lineage, community, and responsibility rather than individual spectacle. The subtext is a warning about appropriation’s favorite trick - keeping the surface, discarding the social meaning. Jarman insists the meaning is the point, and that the “self” Western audiences come looking for may be the wrong unit of analysis.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Joseph
Add to List



