"You know, it's been President Clinton's dream that we'll have finally a fully integrated Europe; and the steps that NATO will take to expand to the East, that's a commitment"
About this Quote
“Fully integrated Europe” is the kind of phrase diplomats love: aspirational, frictionless, and conveniently vague. Warren Christopher deploys it as a moral horizon, then immediately anchors it in a hard instrument of power: NATO expansion “to the East.” The line performs a classic post-Cold War maneuver - wrapping strategic enlargement in the language of a dream, and attaching it to the prestige of a president’s personal vision. It’s not just policy; it’s destiny with a signature.
The intent is reassurance on multiple fronts. To Western Europeans, “integrated” signals stability and the end of old continental fractures. To newly freed states in Central and Eastern Europe, it reads as a promised escape from the gray zone between Moscow and Brussels - an invitation into the West’s security and identity. To skeptics in Washington, “that’s a commitment” frames expansion as credible, actionable, and already in motion, not a wish-list.
The subtext is sharper: integration is being defined less by markets or institutions than by military alignment. NATO becomes the de facto membership card for Europeanness. Christopher’s phrasing also strategically displaces agency: it’s Clinton’s “dream,” NATO’s “steps,” history’s “commitment.” No one person is expanding an alliance; the future is simply arriving, and responsible leaders are keeping up.
Context matters. In the 1990s, the U.S. was trying to lock in the post-Soviet order before it could be revised. The quote sells that project as inevitable and benevolent, while quietly normalizing the idea that Europe’s new unity would be built with an American-led security architecture at its core.
The intent is reassurance on multiple fronts. To Western Europeans, “integrated” signals stability and the end of old continental fractures. To newly freed states in Central and Eastern Europe, it reads as a promised escape from the gray zone between Moscow and Brussels - an invitation into the West’s security and identity. To skeptics in Washington, “that’s a commitment” frames expansion as credible, actionable, and already in motion, not a wish-list.
The subtext is sharper: integration is being defined less by markets or institutions than by military alignment. NATO becomes the de facto membership card for Europeanness. Christopher’s phrasing also strategically displaces agency: it’s Clinton’s “dream,” NATO’s “steps,” history’s “commitment.” No one person is expanding an alliance; the future is simply arriving, and responsible leaders are keeping up.
Context matters. In the 1990s, the U.S. was trying to lock in the post-Soviet order before it could be revised. The quote sells that project as inevitable and benevolent, while quietly normalizing the idea that Europe’s new unity would be built with an American-led security architecture at its core.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Warren
Add to List

