"You know I've had work banned"
About this Quote
Acker’s brag lands like a dare and an indictment: being “banned” isn’t just a casualty of controversy, it’s a résumé line, proof that her writing hit the nervous system of whatever gatekeepers were paid to keep the culture polite. The casual “You know” assumes a shared underground knowledge, as if censorship is gossip passed between co-conspirators. That intimacy matters. Acker isn’t pleading innocence; she’s recruiting you to her side of the barricade.
The subtext is that repression is never abstract. “Work” is labor, art, sex, survival-the stuff women and dissidents are told to keep private, keep clean, keep grateful. To say it’s been banned is to expose how institutions protect their own comfort by criminalizing speech that refuses to behave. Acker’s larger project-piracy, collage, plagiarized classics, pornographic frankness, punctured narratives-was designed to short-circuit the idea of “proper” literature. If you’re writing in a way that can be banned, you’re also writing in a way that can’t be politely absorbed.
Context sharpens the edge: late-20th-century moral panics, obscenity fights, the policing of feminist and queer expression, and a publishing ecosystem that could still be coerced by libraries, customs, and conservative pressure campaigns. Acker converts that coercion into cultural critique. The line doesn’t just celebrate notoriety; it exposes a power dynamic where legitimacy is enforced through exclusion-and where being shut out can be a form of evidence that you were telling the truth too loudly.
The subtext is that repression is never abstract. “Work” is labor, art, sex, survival-the stuff women and dissidents are told to keep private, keep clean, keep grateful. To say it’s been banned is to expose how institutions protect their own comfort by criminalizing speech that refuses to behave. Acker’s larger project-piracy, collage, plagiarized classics, pornographic frankness, punctured narratives-was designed to short-circuit the idea of “proper” literature. If you’re writing in a way that can be banned, you’re also writing in a way that can’t be politely absorbed.
Context sharpens the edge: late-20th-century moral panics, obscenity fights, the policing of feminist and queer expression, and a publishing ecosystem that could still be coerced by libraries, customs, and conservative pressure campaigns. Acker converts that coercion into cultural critique. The line doesn’t just celebrate notoriety; it exposes a power dynamic where legitimacy is enforced through exclusion-and where being shut out can be a form of evidence that you were telling the truth too loudly.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Kathy
Add to List
