"You know, there are not only - all of the networks, and I mean every television news operation and print and radio and magazines, newspapers, all of them, are remiss in the diversity area. I mean, none of these organizations have reached a level of parity"
About this Quote
Chung’s line lands less like a polite suggestion than an indictment delivered in the weary tone of someone who’s done the math too many times. The casual throat-clearing - "You know", "and I mean" - isn’t dithering; it’s rhetorical torque. She’s bracing the listener for a claim that’s both obvious and routinely denied: the entire media ecosystem, across platforms, has failed its own self-mythology.
The intent is broad on purpose. By naming "every television news operation and print and radio and magazines, newspapers, all of them", she refuses the industry’s favorite escape hatch: treating diversity as a boutique problem belonging to a few backward outlets or a single bad newsroom. "Remiss" is an elegant word for systemic negligence - not active malice, but an ongoing decision to treat representation as optional. That’s the subtext: this isn’t a talent pipeline issue; it’s a power-and-hiring issue.
The clincher is "parity". It’s a deliberately non-poetic metric, almost bureaucratic, and that’s why it stings. Parity shifts the conversation from vibes and good intentions to measurable outcomes: who gets hired, promoted, booked, quoted, and trusted with the anchor chair. Coming from Chung - a pioneering Asian American broadcast figure who absorbed the industry’s expectations to be both visible and non-threatening - the comment also reads as experience talking. She’s naming the gap between the press’s watchdog posture and its blind spot: demanding accountability from everyone except itself.
The intent is broad on purpose. By naming "every television news operation and print and radio and magazines, newspapers, all of them", she refuses the industry’s favorite escape hatch: treating diversity as a boutique problem belonging to a few backward outlets or a single bad newsroom. "Remiss" is an elegant word for systemic negligence - not active malice, but an ongoing decision to treat representation as optional. That’s the subtext: this isn’t a talent pipeline issue; it’s a power-and-hiring issue.
The clincher is "parity". It’s a deliberately non-poetic metric, almost bureaucratic, and that’s why it stings. Parity shifts the conversation from vibes and good intentions to measurable outcomes: who gets hired, promoted, booked, quoted, and trusted with the anchor chair. Coming from Chung - a pioneering Asian American broadcast figure who absorbed the industry’s expectations to be both visible and non-threatening - the comment also reads as experience talking. She’s naming the gap between the press’s watchdog posture and its blind spot: demanding accountability from everyone except itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Connie
Add to List






