"You know, we - if, for example, Jerry Brown can withstand, you know, what will probably end up being $200 million of spending by his opponent and get elected governor of California, that will be a big victory in the nation's largest state"
About this Quote
Listen to the nervous tic of "you know" and you can hear the real message trying to stay polite. Axelrod is ostensibly talking about Jerry Brown, but he’s really translating a brutal modern axiom of politics: elections are no longer just contests of ideas; they’re endurance trials against money.
The specific intent is tactical reassurance. Axelrod frames Brown’s hypothetical win as proof of concept for Democrats: you can survive a cash tsunami if you have the right candidate, message discipline, and coalition. By naming the figure ($200 million), he doesn’t just cite spending; he weaponizes it, turning fundraising into a villain the audience already dislikes. The verb choice matters too. Brown doesn’t “out-argue” or “out-organize” his opponent; he “withstands.” That’s a disaster metaphor. Money becomes weather.
The subtext is a warning dressed up as optimism. Axelrod implies that what’s happening in California is a bellwether for the whole country: if the richest political marketplace can still be won without surrendering entirely to the highest bidder, there’s hope. If not, the lesson is darker: democratic legitimacy will increasingly be priced like prime-time ad inventory.
Contextually, this sits in the post-Citizens United era, when outside spending and independent expenditure groups were reshaping campaign reality. California, “the nation’s largest state,” isn’t just geographic bragging; it’s symbolic terrain. Win there under siege, and you claim momentum, narrative, and a fleeting argument that votes can still beat dollars.
The specific intent is tactical reassurance. Axelrod frames Brown’s hypothetical win as proof of concept for Democrats: you can survive a cash tsunami if you have the right candidate, message discipline, and coalition. By naming the figure ($200 million), he doesn’t just cite spending; he weaponizes it, turning fundraising into a villain the audience already dislikes. The verb choice matters too. Brown doesn’t “out-argue” or “out-organize” his opponent; he “withstands.” That’s a disaster metaphor. Money becomes weather.
The subtext is a warning dressed up as optimism. Axelrod implies that what’s happening in California is a bellwether for the whole country: if the richest political marketplace can still be won without surrendering entirely to the highest bidder, there’s hope. If not, the lesson is darker: democratic legitimacy will increasingly be priced like prime-time ad inventory.
Contextually, this sits in the post-Citizens United era, when outside spending and independent expenditure groups were reshaping campaign reality. California, “the nation’s largest state,” isn’t just geographic bragging; it’s symbolic terrain. Win there under siege, and you claim momentum, narrative, and a fleeting argument that votes can still beat dollars.
Quote Details
| Topic | Victory |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List
