"You may hate gravity, but gravity doesn't care"
About this Quote
Clayton Christensen offers a bracing reminder that reality is indifferent to our preferences. Gravity is a metaphor for the nonnegotiable forces that govern outcomes, whether in physics, markets, or organizations. You can resent constraints, deny trends, or argue with data, but the underlying dynamics continue to operate. The only question is whether you will align with them or be disciplined by them.
Christensen studied why great companies fail and found patterns that behave like laws. Disruption does not wait for incumbents to consent; it starts in low-end or new markets where margins look unattractive, improves along an S-curve, and eventually satisfies mainstream needs. Managerial processes built to optimize the core become blinders. Resource allocation follows the best current customers and the highest immediate returns. Leaders may hate cannibalizing their own business, but the economics of a new technology and the pull of customer jobs-to-be-done do not care about those feelings.
History is full of firms that treated disruptive entrants as trivial until the gravitational pull of better cost structures and evolving customer expectations made the old model unsustainable. Film did not beat digital by wishing, nor did physical rental stores out-argue streaming. The firms that navigated change accepted the constraints early, carved out autonomous teams, and designed offerings around the real jobs customers were hiring products to do. They learned within the new physics instead of trying to rewrite it.
There is a personal lesson, too. Unit economics, time limits, skill gaps, and feedback from users are forms of gravity. Ambition matters, but it only creates lift if paired with a clear reading of forces and disciplined experimentation. Christensen’s line is ultimately optimistic because it points to a reliable path: start with truth, however inconvenient, and work creatively within it. You cannot negotiate with gravity, but you can build wings.
Christensen studied why great companies fail and found patterns that behave like laws. Disruption does not wait for incumbents to consent; it starts in low-end or new markets where margins look unattractive, improves along an S-curve, and eventually satisfies mainstream needs. Managerial processes built to optimize the core become blinders. Resource allocation follows the best current customers and the highest immediate returns. Leaders may hate cannibalizing their own business, but the economics of a new technology and the pull of customer jobs-to-be-done do not care about those feelings.
History is full of firms that treated disruptive entrants as trivial until the gravitational pull of better cost structures and evolving customer expectations made the old model unsustainable. Film did not beat digital by wishing, nor did physical rental stores out-argue streaming. The firms that navigated change accepted the constraints early, carved out autonomous teams, and designed offerings around the real jobs customers were hiring products to do. They learned within the new physics instead of trying to rewrite it.
There is a personal lesson, too. Unit economics, time limits, skill gaps, and feedback from users are forms of gravity. Ambition matters, but it only creates lift if paired with a clear reading of forces and disciplined experimentation. Christensen’s line is ultimately optimistic because it points to a reliable path: start with truth, however inconvenient, and work creatively within it. You cannot negotiate with gravity, but you can build wings.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Clayton
Add to List
