"You see, the Greenhouse Effect is a direct result of burning fossil or old carbon fuels"
About this Quote
Herer’s line has the blunt, street-corner clarity of an activist who’s tired of euphemisms. No poetic hedging, no policy-speak: a direct causal chain meant to snap the listener out of passive concern and into moral accounting. “You see” isn’t a polite preface so much as a corrective, the sound of someone insisting the audience has been misled or lulled. He’s not inviting debate; he’s staging an intervention.
The key move is linguistic: “fossil or old carbon fuels.” Herer makes “fossil” feel less like a neutral category and more like a bad habit - an addiction to burning the past. By reframing fossil fuels as “old carbon,” he smuggles in a powerful metaphor: we are exhuming ancient sunlight and stuffing it into the present atmosphere, then acting surprised when the system overheats. The scientific concept becomes intuitive and, crucially, blame-able.
Context matters because Herer wasn’t just any environmentalist; he was a countercultural organizer best known for hemp advocacy and a broader critique of petrochemical and industrial power. Read that way, the sentence doubles as an indictment of entrenched interests: climate change isn’t a mysterious planetary mood swing, it’s a predictable outcome of a profit-driven energy regime.
The intent is strategic simplification. In activist rhetoric, “direct result” is less a technical claim than a rallying one: if the cause is straightforward, so is the mandate - stop feeding the fire.
The key move is linguistic: “fossil or old carbon fuels.” Herer makes “fossil” feel less like a neutral category and more like a bad habit - an addiction to burning the past. By reframing fossil fuels as “old carbon,” he smuggles in a powerful metaphor: we are exhuming ancient sunlight and stuffing it into the present atmosphere, then acting surprised when the system overheats. The scientific concept becomes intuitive and, crucially, blame-able.
Context matters because Herer wasn’t just any environmentalist; he was a countercultural organizer best known for hemp advocacy and a broader critique of petrochemical and industrial power. Read that way, the sentence doubles as an indictment of entrenched interests: climate change isn’t a mysterious planetary mood swing, it’s a predictable outcome of a profit-driven energy regime.
The intent is strategic simplification. In activist rhetoric, “direct result” is less a technical claim than a rallying one: if the cause is straightforward, so is the mandate - stop feeding the fire.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Jack
Add to List



