"You want to keep intelligence separate from policy"
About this Quote
The intent is defensive: protect intelligence from being bent into a brief for decisions already made. When policy drives intelligence, the question stops being "What’s happening?" and becomes "What can we cite?" That shift turns analysts into advocates and uncertainty into a nuisance. Inman’s phrasing is tellingly plain, almost parental: you want to keep. Not you must, not you should. It’s the voice of someone who has watched the separation fail and knows how easily it fails when political timelines collide with ambiguous data.
The subtext is a warning about contamination. Once policymakers signal what they need to be true, intelligence collection, analysis, and even the language of assessment start drifting toward confirmation. The institution’s value - its ability to disappoint power with inconvenient facts - gets traded for access and influence.
Contextually, this reads like post-Vietnam and especially post-Cold War scar tissue, later vindicated by the Iraq WMD era: the high cost of letting policy launder itself through intelligence. Inman’s restraint is the point. He’s describing a firebreak, not a slogan.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Inman, Bobby Ray. (2026, January 16). You want to keep intelligence separate from policy. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/you-want-to-keep-intelligence-separate-from-policy-101227/
Chicago Style
Inman, Bobby Ray. "You want to keep intelligence separate from policy." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/you-want-to-keep-intelligence-separate-from-policy-101227/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"You want to keep intelligence separate from policy." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/you-want-to-keep-intelligence-separate-from-policy-101227/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.



