"You will not dishonor the divine perfections by judgments unworthy of them, provided you never judge of Him by yourself, provided you do not ascribe to the Creator the imperfections and limitations of created beings"
About this Quote
Malebranche is policing your imagination as much as your theology. The line reads like a warning label for the mind: do not drag God down to human scale, because the very act of picturing the divine as a bigger version of you is already a category error. That “provided” does the heavy lifting. It’s conditional, almost juridical, as if proper piety isn’t primarily about emotion but about intellectual hygiene.
The intent sits squarely in 17th-century rational Christianity, where God’s perfection had to survive both the rise of scientific explanation and the messier, anthropomorphic God of popular devotion. Malebranche, a Cartesian, is defending transcendence by defending method: you can’t reason upward from your own psychology and call it metaphysics. Judge “of Him” by yourself and you end up smuggling in the petty limits of creatures - mood, partiality, time, ignorance - then blaming the Creator for the flaws you imported.
The subtext is a rebuke to projection, but also to a certain kind of religious confidence. If you think you know what God “must” want because it mirrors your preferences, you’re not reverent; you’re self-authorizing. There’s a quiet politics here: humility becomes epistemology. You’re allowed to make judgments about God only if you’ve first admitted how unreliable your default measuring stick is.
It works because it turns devotion into discipline. Instead of demanding belief, it demands you stop flattering yourself by turning your limitations into divine attributes.
The intent sits squarely in 17th-century rational Christianity, where God’s perfection had to survive both the rise of scientific explanation and the messier, anthropomorphic God of popular devotion. Malebranche, a Cartesian, is defending transcendence by defending method: you can’t reason upward from your own psychology and call it metaphysics. Judge “of Him” by yourself and you end up smuggling in the petty limits of creatures - mood, partiality, time, ignorance - then blaming the Creator for the flaws you imported.
The subtext is a rebuke to projection, but also to a certain kind of religious confidence. If you think you know what God “must” want because it mirrors your preferences, you’re not reverent; you’re self-authorizing. There’s a quiet politics here: humility becomes epistemology. You’re allowed to make judgments about God only if you’ve first admitted how unreliable your default measuring stick is.
It works because it turns devotion into discipline. Instead of demanding belief, it demands you stop flattering yourself by turning your limitations into divine attributes.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Nicolas
Add to List






