"You'd never have a motorcycle policeman out on the Indian reservation"
About this Quote
The line lands like an offhand observation, but it’s really a thesis about where state power does and doesn’t bother showing up. A “motorcycle policeman” is a very particular symbol: sleek, mobile, highly visible authority built for enforcing order in spaces designed for speed, commerce, and compliance. Put that figure “out on the Indian reservation” and the image collapses. It’s not just impractical; it’s culturally and politically incongruous. Cox is pointing at a jurisdictional and moral gap so entrenched it reads as common sense.
The intent is less to describe policing logistics than to expose a hierarchy of attention. Reservations in the American imagination often function as administrative blind spots: places the nation remembers when it wants myth (the frontier, “heritage”) and forgets when it owes services, infrastructure, or protection. The joke is that the state’s most performative, cinematic kind of cop would never patrol there because the performance isn’t for residents; it’s for the public that matters.
Subtextually, the quote carries a double indictment. It suggests neglect (law enforcement as absent, under-resourced, or indifferent) and also hints at the uneasy sovereignty question: reservations aren’t simply another “neighborhood” to be policed, but policed differently, inconsistently, sometimes not at all, sometimes excessively, depending on which authority claims the right.
Coming from a director, it’s also a comment on mise-en-scene: the visual grammar of America’s power can’t be staged everywhere without revealing its own limits. The absence becomes the point.
The intent is less to describe policing logistics than to expose a hierarchy of attention. Reservations in the American imagination often function as administrative blind spots: places the nation remembers when it wants myth (the frontier, “heritage”) and forgets when it owes services, infrastructure, or protection. The joke is that the state’s most performative, cinematic kind of cop would never patrol there because the performance isn’t for residents; it’s for the public that matters.
Subtextually, the quote carries a double indictment. It suggests neglect (law enforcement as absent, under-resourced, or indifferent) and also hints at the uneasy sovereignty question: reservations aren’t simply another “neighborhood” to be policed, but policed differently, inconsistently, sometimes not at all, sometimes excessively, depending on which authority claims the right.
Coming from a director, it’s also a comment on mise-en-scene: the visual grammar of America’s power can’t be staged everywhere without revealing its own limits. The absence becomes the point.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Alex
Add to List






