"You're only dealing with whatever you know, which is a very small part of it and later on it'll look like it has something to do with the period. Obviously, the artists have something to do with one another. They tend to set up certain common qualities among themselves"
About this Quote
Judd is puncturing the romance of the all-seeing artist. He starts from a blunt premise: what you can work with is what you actually know, and that knowledge is partial, even stingy. The swagger here is in the refusal to pretend otherwise. Minimalism often gets cast as pure idea or pure form, but Judd is describing a practice that’s almost anti-mythic: you make from your limits, then history comes along later and turns those limits into a “period.”
That’s the sly subtext: movements are often retroactive inventions. In the studio, you’re not sculpting “the 1960s” or “Minimalism”; you’re solving problems in real time with the materials, vocabulary, and conversations available to you. Only later does the work get draped in periodization, as if it were always marching in formation toward an art-historical label. Judd’s “it’ll look like” is doing the heavy lifting - a quiet jab at critics and institutions that treat chronology as destiny.
When he concedes that artists “obviously” relate to one another, he’s not endorsing the tidy family tree. He’s describing a social ecology: peers share studios, shows, arguments, magazines, fabrication shops, and grudges. “Common qualities” aren’t commandments; they’re emergent properties of proximity. Judd’s intent is to reclaim causality from the textbook. The period isn’t the engine; the network is. And the network runs on partial knowledge, not total vision.
That’s the sly subtext: movements are often retroactive inventions. In the studio, you’re not sculpting “the 1960s” or “Minimalism”; you’re solving problems in real time with the materials, vocabulary, and conversations available to you. Only later does the work get draped in periodization, as if it were always marching in formation toward an art-historical label. Judd’s “it’ll look like” is doing the heavy lifting - a quiet jab at critics and institutions that treat chronology as destiny.
When he concedes that artists “obviously” relate to one another, he’s not endorsing the tidy family tree. He’s describing a social ecology: peers share studios, shows, arguments, magazines, fabrication shops, and grudges. “Common qualities” aren’t commandments; they’re emergent properties of proximity. Judd’s intent is to reclaim causality from the textbook. The period isn’t the engine; the network is. And the network runs on partial knowledge, not total vision.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Donald
Add to List







