"You've got to either say you're going to cut taxes and find some spending cuts. I think we ought to reform long-term entitlement spending in the country, but you can't out of one side of your mouth say, 'Yes, we're for tax cuts, we're for spending discipline, and we're for bringing down the debt.'"
About this Quote
Ford is calling out a familiar Washington magic trick: promising a tax-cut sugar high while also vowing fiscal sobriety, as if the math will politely look away. The line works because it’s built like a courtroom cross-examination. “You’ve got to either” sets a forced choice, cornering opponents into admitting trade-offs they’d rather blur. Then comes the knife: “out of one side of your mouth,” a phrase that turns budget debate into a question of character, not spreadsheets. It’s not just “your plan doesn’t add up”; it’s “you’re talking like someone who thinks voters are gullible.”
The subtext is a warning about the coalition politics of the era Ford came up in: Republicans campaigning on tax cuts, Democrats often defending major social programs, both parties wary of touching entitlements because older voters actually show up. By naming “long-term entitlement spending,” Ford is gesturing at the real driver of future deficits (Social Security, Medicare) without detailing the politically radioactive specifics. Reform is floated as the grown-up answer, but kept abstract enough to avoid lighting the match.
Contextually, this is the language of the fiscally responsible centrist trying to reclaim credibility in an environment where “spending discipline” is a slogan and “debt reduction” is a costume worn at election time. Ford’s intent isn’t technocratic; it’s moral arithmetic: you can choose tax cuts, you can choose debt reduction, you can choose untouched entitlements. Stop pretending you can have all three.
The subtext is a warning about the coalition politics of the era Ford came up in: Republicans campaigning on tax cuts, Democrats often defending major social programs, both parties wary of touching entitlements because older voters actually show up. By naming “long-term entitlement spending,” Ford is gesturing at the real driver of future deficits (Social Security, Medicare) without detailing the politically radioactive specifics. Reform is floated as the grown-up answer, but kept abstract enough to avoid lighting the match.
Contextually, this is the language of the fiscally responsible centrist trying to reclaim credibility in an environment where “spending discipline” is a slogan and “debt reduction” is a costume worn at election time. Ford’s intent isn’t technocratic; it’s moral arithmetic: you can choose tax cuts, you can choose debt reduction, you can choose untouched entitlements. Stop pretending you can have all three.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Harold
Add to List





