Essay: Remarks on the Mind–Body Question
Overview
Eugene Wigner examines the tension between quantum mechanics and consciousness, arguing that the standard quantum formalism leaves an unresolved role for the observer. He traces how the measurement problem emerges from the linear, unitary evolution of quantum states and how that evolution seems to conflict with the definite outcomes experienced by conscious observers. Wigner treats this tension as more than a technical puzzle: it raises foundational questions about whether physical theory can be complete without accounting for the mind.
Wigner frames the discussion historically and conceptually, invoking von Neumann's analysis of measurement chains and emphasizing that, according to the formalism, a measurement coupling produces entanglement that propagates up through macroscopic apparatus and ultimately to the observer. The central worry is that nothing inside the physical description forces the transition from a superposed state to the single definite perception that characterizes experience.
Wigner's friend thought experiment
Wigner introduces a now-famous thought experiment in which an observer's friend performs a quantum measurement inside a closed laboratory while Wigner remains outside. To the friend, a definite outcome is observed; to Wigner, until he opens the door, the joint system of measured particle, apparatus, and friend must be described by a superposition. This leads to an apparent contradiction: the friend's conscious experience seems definite, whereas the external quantum description implies no definite fact until Wigner makes an observation.
The thought experiment highlights the difficulty of locating the "cut" between quantum and classical, or between superposition and collapse. Wigner uses it to argue that the usual quantum rules cannot consistently describe both the physical chain of interactions and the emergence of a single conscious experience unless consciousness itself is accorded a special role in bringing about collapse.
Consciousness and collapse
Wigner entertains the provocative hypothesis that consciousness causes the collapse of the wavefunction. He suggests that when a conscious mind becomes correlated with a quantum system, the superposition is resolved into a definite experience. This proposal is motivated less by a detailed dynamical model than by the insistence that no purely physical account within the then-current framework can explain the transition from superposition to definite perceptions.
Wigner acknowledges the philosophical costs of this move: it places the mind outside standard physical description and raises difficult questions about the ontology of consciousness and its interaction with matter. He presents the suggestion as a serious possibility rather than an established fact, inviting reflection on whether a future more complete theory might either vindicate or overturn the conjecture.
Philosophical implications and debate
The essay presses on broader metaphysical themes, asking whether consciousness must be treated as a primitive feature of the world or whether physics can be extended to remove that primitiveness. Wigner discusses the limits of operationalist and instrumentalist responses, arguing that merely denying an ontological problem sidesteps the real puzzle about experiential definiteness. He emphasizes the need for conceptual clarity about what counts as an observer and what counts as a physical measurement.
Wigner's stance provoked sustained debate. His arguments catalyzed discussion of observer-dependent formulations, objective collapse models, many-worlds interpretations, and the role of decoherence. The essay remains influential for forcing physicists and philosophers to confront the measurement problem squarely and for popularizing the "Wigner's friend" scenario as a diagnostic tool for theories of quantum measurement.
Legacy
The essay is remembered as a bold engagement with hard foundational questions rather than a definitive solution. It sharpened attention to the conceptual gap between quantum formalism and conscious experience and helped generate alternative approaches that attempt to reconcile the formalism with observed definiteness without invoking a special status for mind. Wigner's insistence that the measurement problem implicates deep questions about reality continues to shape discussions at the intersection of physics, philosophy, and cognitive theory.
Eugene Wigner examines the tension between quantum mechanics and consciousness, arguing that the standard quantum formalism leaves an unresolved role for the observer. He traces how the measurement problem emerges from the linear, unitary evolution of quantum states and how that evolution seems to conflict with the definite outcomes experienced by conscious observers. Wigner treats this tension as more than a technical puzzle: it raises foundational questions about whether physical theory can be complete without accounting for the mind.
Wigner frames the discussion historically and conceptually, invoking von Neumann's analysis of measurement chains and emphasizing that, according to the formalism, a measurement coupling produces entanglement that propagates up through macroscopic apparatus and ultimately to the observer. The central worry is that nothing inside the physical description forces the transition from a superposed state to the single definite perception that characterizes experience.
Wigner's friend thought experiment
Wigner introduces a now-famous thought experiment in which an observer's friend performs a quantum measurement inside a closed laboratory while Wigner remains outside. To the friend, a definite outcome is observed; to Wigner, until he opens the door, the joint system of measured particle, apparatus, and friend must be described by a superposition. This leads to an apparent contradiction: the friend's conscious experience seems definite, whereas the external quantum description implies no definite fact until Wigner makes an observation.
The thought experiment highlights the difficulty of locating the "cut" between quantum and classical, or between superposition and collapse. Wigner uses it to argue that the usual quantum rules cannot consistently describe both the physical chain of interactions and the emergence of a single conscious experience unless consciousness itself is accorded a special role in bringing about collapse.
Consciousness and collapse
Wigner entertains the provocative hypothesis that consciousness causes the collapse of the wavefunction. He suggests that when a conscious mind becomes correlated with a quantum system, the superposition is resolved into a definite experience. This proposal is motivated less by a detailed dynamical model than by the insistence that no purely physical account within the then-current framework can explain the transition from superposition to definite perceptions.
Wigner acknowledges the philosophical costs of this move: it places the mind outside standard physical description and raises difficult questions about the ontology of consciousness and its interaction with matter. He presents the suggestion as a serious possibility rather than an established fact, inviting reflection on whether a future more complete theory might either vindicate or overturn the conjecture.
Philosophical implications and debate
The essay presses on broader metaphysical themes, asking whether consciousness must be treated as a primitive feature of the world or whether physics can be extended to remove that primitiveness. Wigner discusses the limits of operationalist and instrumentalist responses, arguing that merely denying an ontological problem sidesteps the real puzzle about experiential definiteness. He emphasizes the need for conceptual clarity about what counts as an observer and what counts as a physical measurement.
Wigner's stance provoked sustained debate. His arguments catalyzed discussion of observer-dependent formulations, objective collapse models, many-worlds interpretations, and the role of decoherence. The essay remains influential for forcing physicists and philosophers to confront the measurement problem squarely and for popularizing the "Wigner's friend" scenario as a diagnostic tool for theories of quantum measurement.
Legacy
The essay is remembered as a bold engagement with hard foundational questions rather than a definitive solution. It sharpened attention to the conceptual gap between quantum formalism and conscious experience and helped generate alternative approaches that attempt to reconcile the formalism with observed definiteness without invoking a special status for mind. Wigner's insistence that the measurement problem implicates deep questions about reality continues to shape discussions at the intersection of physics, philosophy, and cognitive theory.
Remarks on the Mind–Body Question
Essay exploring the relation between consciousness and quantum mechanics; contains the well-known 'Wigner's friend' thought experiment, raising questions about measurement, observers, and the possible role of consciousness in wavefunction collapse.
- Publication Year: 1961
- Type: Essay
- Genre: Philosophy of mind, Physics, Quantum foundations
- Language: en
- View all works by Eugene Wigner on Amazon
Author: Eugene Wigner
Eugene Wigner covering his life, contributions to symmetry and quantum mechanics, Manhattan Project work, and legacy.
More about Eugene Wigner
- Occup.: Physicist
- From: USA
- Other works:
- Group Theory and Its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra (1931 Book)
- On the Quantum Correction for Thermodynamic Equilibrium (1932 Essay)
- On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group (1939 Essay)
- The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences (1960 Essay)
- Nobel Lecture (On the Application of Symmetry Principles in Quantum Mechanics) (1963 Essay)
- Symmetries and Reflections: Scientific Essays (1967 Collection)