Play: The Best Man
Overview
The Best Man is a razor-sharp political drama set during the turbulent hours of a major U.S. presidential convention. The play concentrates on the backstage maneuvering that determines who will receive a party's nomination, bringing private loyalties and public ambitions into collision. Gore Vidal uses fast, witty dialogue and concentrated scenes to expose how personal character and political calculation shape American leadership.
Dramatic action
Action unfolds almost entirely in the cramped, high-pressure world of hotel suites and delegate meetings where conventions actually get decided. Conversations that begin as friendly counsel soon reveal strategic bargaining, whispered threats and the weighing of secrets. The playwright stages a sequence of choices and revelations that force characters to choose between expediency and principle, with each vote and phone call carrying the weight of moral consequence.
Characters and conflict
At the play's center are two rival candidates who embody contrasting styles of politics: one polished, intellectual and seemingly guided by conscience; the other blunt, combative and willing to exploit any advantage. Surrounding them are aides, former allies and party bosses whose own ambitions and fears complicate the contest. Relationships fray as reputations and private histories become political ammunition, and friendships are tested by the brutal arithmetic of winning.
Themes and style
Vidal probes enduring questions about power, honesty and the compromises inherent in democratic politics. The play interrogates whether integrity is a practical asset in the pursuit of office or a liability easily erased by the exigencies of campaigning. Sidestepping easy judgment, the text presents characters as both sympathetic and culpable, making the audience uneasy about rooting for purity or pragmatism. Vidal's tone is satirical yet elegiac, balancing sharp political critique with an awareness of the human costs of ambition.
Political and moral stakes
Revelations about private conduct and strategic leaks drive the plot's tension, forcing a series of ethical decisions that determine not only who will be nominated but what kind of leadership the party will offer the nation. The drama frames political success as a moral mirror: the tactics parties accept and the compromises they justify reveal deeper values. The play also considers the role of the press, party elders and the fragmenting loyalties that define modern campaigns.
Reception and legacy
Praised for its topicality and conversational verve, The Best Man resonated strongly with audiences and critics who recognized its accurate, often unflattering portrait of electoral politics. The play's mix of sharp dialogue and moral seriousness secured a film adaptation and repeated revivals, and its themes have remained painfully relevant in later election cycles. Vidal's work endures as both a trenchant satire and a thoughtful meditation on the costs of leadership and the perilous balance between principle and power.
The Best Man is a razor-sharp political drama set during the turbulent hours of a major U.S. presidential convention. The play concentrates on the backstage maneuvering that determines who will receive a party's nomination, bringing private loyalties and public ambitions into collision. Gore Vidal uses fast, witty dialogue and concentrated scenes to expose how personal character and political calculation shape American leadership.
Dramatic action
Action unfolds almost entirely in the cramped, high-pressure world of hotel suites and delegate meetings where conventions actually get decided. Conversations that begin as friendly counsel soon reveal strategic bargaining, whispered threats and the weighing of secrets. The playwright stages a sequence of choices and revelations that force characters to choose between expediency and principle, with each vote and phone call carrying the weight of moral consequence.
Characters and conflict
At the play's center are two rival candidates who embody contrasting styles of politics: one polished, intellectual and seemingly guided by conscience; the other blunt, combative and willing to exploit any advantage. Surrounding them are aides, former allies and party bosses whose own ambitions and fears complicate the contest. Relationships fray as reputations and private histories become political ammunition, and friendships are tested by the brutal arithmetic of winning.
Themes and style
Vidal probes enduring questions about power, honesty and the compromises inherent in democratic politics. The play interrogates whether integrity is a practical asset in the pursuit of office or a liability easily erased by the exigencies of campaigning. Sidestepping easy judgment, the text presents characters as both sympathetic and culpable, making the audience uneasy about rooting for purity or pragmatism. Vidal's tone is satirical yet elegiac, balancing sharp political critique with an awareness of the human costs of ambition.
Political and moral stakes
Revelations about private conduct and strategic leaks drive the plot's tension, forcing a series of ethical decisions that determine not only who will be nominated but what kind of leadership the party will offer the nation. The drama frames political success as a moral mirror: the tactics parties accept and the compromises they justify reveal deeper values. The play also considers the role of the press, party elders and the fragmenting loyalties that define modern campaigns.
Reception and legacy
Praised for its topicality and conversational verve, The Best Man resonated strongly with audiences and critics who recognized its accurate, often unflattering portrait of electoral politics. The play's mix of sharp dialogue and moral seriousness secured a film adaptation and repeated revivals, and its themes have remained painfully relevant in later election cycles. Vidal's work endures as both a trenchant satire and a thoughtful meditation on the costs of leadership and the perilous balance between principle and power.
The Best Man
A political drama set during a U.S. presidential convention that contrasts idealism and opportunism in American politics. The play focuses on rival candidates and the moral choices behind campaigns and power.
- Publication Year: 1960
- Type: Play
- Genre: Political Drama
- Language: en
- View all works by Gore Vidal on Amazon
Author: Gore Vidal
Gore Vidal covering his life, literary career, political involvement, essays, plays, and notable quotations.
More about Gore Vidal
- Occup.: Novelist
- From: USA
- Other works:
- Williwaw (1946 Novel)
- The City and the Pillar (1948 Novel)
- Dark Green, Bright Red (1950 Novel)
- The Judgment of Paris (1952 Novel)
- Messiah (1954 Novel)
- Julian (1964 Novel)
- Myra Breckinridge (1968 Novel)
- An Evening With Richard Nixon (as if He Were Dead) (1972 Play)
- Burr (1973 Novel)
- Myron (1974 Novel)
- 1876 (1976 Novel)
- Lincoln (1984 Novel)
- Empire (1987 Novel)
- Hollywood (1990 Novel)
- Live from Golgotha (1992 Novel)
- United States: Essays 1952–1992 (1993 Collection)
- Palimpsest: A Memoir (1995 Memoir)
- The Golden Age (2000 Novel)
- Dreaming War: Blood for Oil and the Cheney-Bush Junta (2002 Non-fiction)