IntroThe 2021 film, "Roe v. Wade", directed by Nick Loeb and Cathy Allyn, reinterprets one of the most landmark legal choices of the 20th century-- the 1973 United States Supreme Court case that acknowledged a woman's constitutional right to safe and legal abortion. Given its subject matter, the movie rapidly drew the attention of conversations on abortion rights and feminist jurisprudence, nevertheless, the movie adopts an anti-abortion stance, illustrating the pro-choice movement in an unfavorable light.
Plot and Characters"Roe v. Wade" is told from the viewpoint of Dr. Bernard Nathanson, a dedicated obstetrician-gynecologist, and prolific abortion supplier who later ends up being a vehement anti-abortion activist. Depicted by co-director Nick Loeb, Nathanson is revealed as a conflicted character with doubts about allowing abortions. An essential secondary character is Larry Lader, played by Jamie Kennedy. Lader is illustrated as the cunning strategist behind the abortion rights movement. The movie also consists of a cast of Supreme Court justices who ultimately rule on the case.
Story and PortrayalThe movie begins by providing Dr. Nathanson and Lader's collaboration in founding the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL). The story is chronologically structured, revealing the actions causing Roe v. Wade, sprinkled with scenes showing the court proceedings that caused the decision.
It paints an image of the pro-choice motion as manipulative and deceiving. In one scene, the movie insinuates that Lader and Betty Friedan, creator of the National Organization for Women (NOW), pushed their hesitant board members into embracing a pro-choice stance. It even more illustrates the advocates of abortion rights as actively misleading the media and public about abortion-related realities and statistics.
Controversy and Criticisms"Roe v. Wade" has been extensively criticized for its one-sided portrayal and distortion of historical facts. Critics argue that it demonizes the individuals and companies advocating for a female's right to choose, providing them as unethical.
Further, the movie was criticized for its doing not have representation of Norma McCorvey, the 'Jane Roe' of Roe v. Wade. While McCorvey is a main character to the historical occasion, she appears as a small character in the movie, consequently not effectively representing her battles or viewpoints.
Conclusion"Roe v. Wade", regardless of its claims, is less an accurate stating of this historic court case and more a heavily biased anti-abortion statement. The film focuses more on the orchestrators of the judgment, especially Dr. Nathanson's shifting viewpoints on abortion instead of supplying a precise representation of the many ladies affected by the case and the more comprehensive ramifications for ladies's rights. The debate surrounding the film, particularly provided the ongoing discourse on abortion rights, contributes to its notoriety. Despite the filmmakers' designated message, the slanted storytelling and historical inaccuracies have resulted in extensive criticism from audiences, making it a dissentious addition to the argument on reproductive rights.
Top Cast
