"A formally recognized equality does, however, accord the smaller nations a position which they should be able to use increasingly in the interest of humanity as a whole and in the service of the ideal"
About this Quote
A bland-sounding sentence that’s actually a quiet demand for a new world order: Branting takes the technocratic phrase "formally recognized equality" and loads it with moral ambition. He’s talking about more than legal parity on paper. He’s arguing that recognition itself is power, and that smaller nations can convert diplomatic status into leverage if the rules of international life are rewritten to treat them as actors, not pawns.
The intent is strategic and idealist at once. As a Swedish Social Democrat and an early champion of the League of Nations, Branting is writing from a Europe where "great powers" had treated smaller states like buffer zones and bargaining chips. After World War I, the pitch for multilateralism needed a justification that wasn’t just fear of the next catastrophe. So he frames equality as a tool: give small countries standing, and you create a counterweight to imperial reflexes. The phrase "increasingly" matters; it’s incrementalism disguised as destiny, implying that moral progress in diplomacy is not a leap but a ratchet.
The subtext is a warning aimed at the giants. If equality is "formal" only, it’s a façade that preserves old hierarchies. If it’s recognized and usable, it becomes a discipline on power: small states can coalition-build, set norms, and insist that international law apply beyond the strong. "Humanity as a whole" isn’t sentimental; it’s a rhetorical move that elevates national self-interest into a shared ethical project, making resistance to small-state agency sound like resistance to civilization itself.
The intent is strategic and idealist at once. As a Swedish Social Democrat and an early champion of the League of Nations, Branting is writing from a Europe where "great powers" had treated smaller states like buffer zones and bargaining chips. After World War I, the pitch for multilateralism needed a justification that wasn’t just fear of the next catastrophe. So he frames equality as a tool: give small countries standing, and you create a counterweight to imperial reflexes. The phrase "increasingly" matters; it’s incrementalism disguised as destiny, implying that moral progress in diplomacy is not a leap but a ratchet.
The subtext is a warning aimed at the giants. If equality is "formal" only, it’s a façade that preserves old hierarchies. If it’s recognized and usable, it becomes a discipline on power: small states can coalition-build, set norms, and insist that international law apply beyond the strong. "Humanity as a whole" isn’t sentimental; it’s a rhetorical move that elevates national self-interest into a shared ethical project, making resistance to small-state agency sound like resistance to civilization itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Hjalmar
Add to List
