"A growing and increasingly influential movement of philosophers, ethicists, law professors and activists are convinced that the great moral struggle of our time will be for the rights of animals"
About this Quote
Michael Pollan points to a moral frontier that has moved from the margins to the mainstream. For centuries, moral progress has widened the circle of concern, and many philosophers now argue that the next expansion must include nonhuman animals. The claim is not sentimental but analytic: if suffering matters, and animals are capable of suffering, then our institutions that treat them as mere means face a profound ethical challenge. Thinkers like Peter Singer and Tom Regan offered the utilitarian and rights-based blueprints; lawyers and activists have translated those arguments into campaigns, lawsuits, and corporate reforms; scientists have deepened the case by documenting animal cognition and sentience.
Pollan writes from the vantage point of a reporter of food systems and a critic of industrial agriculture. In his landmark essay An Animal's Place, he wrestled with Singer’s arguments and the realities of factory farming, conceding the vast, invisible suffering built into cheap meat while exploring whether husbandry and respectful omnivory can be defended. He is no absolutist, yet he recognizes that the moral pressure created by factory farming’s scale and opacity cannot be wished away. The struggle he anticipates unfolds not only in courts and philosophy seminars, but at dinner tables, checkout counters, and farms.
Legal scholars who once asked whether animals are property or persons now win narrow but symbolically potent cases, challenging confinement practices and pressing for standing. Meanwhile, alternative proteins, from plant-based to cultivated meat, erode the excuse of necessity. Environmental and public health costs of animal agriculture reinforce the ethical critique, binding climate, antibiotics, and zoonotic risk to animal welfare.
The line reads as prediction and provocation. Whether society ultimately adopts full rights, robust welfare protections, or differentiated statuses, the question is unavoidable: how far will we extend moral and legal consideration beyond our species? The answer will test our appetites, markets, and laws, and reveal what kind of community we are willing to become.
Pollan writes from the vantage point of a reporter of food systems and a critic of industrial agriculture. In his landmark essay An Animal's Place, he wrestled with Singer’s arguments and the realities of factory farming, conceding the vast, invisible suffering built into cheap meat while exploring whether husbandry and respectful omnivory can be defended. He is no absolutist, yet he recognizes that the moral pressure created by factory farming’s scale and opacity cannot be wished away. The struggle he anticipates unfolds not only in courts and philosophy seminars, but at dinner tables, checkout counters, and farms.
Legal scholars who once asked whether animals are property or persons now win narrow but symbolically potent cases, challenging confinement practices and pressing for standing. Meanwhile, alternative proteins, from plant-based to cultivated meat, erode the excuse of necessity. Environmental and public health costs of animal agriculture reinforce the ethical critique, binding climate, antibiotics, and zoonotic risk to animal welfare.
The line reads as prediction and provocation. Whether society ultimately adopts full rights, robust welfare protections, or differentiated statuses, the question is unavoidable: how far will we extend moral and legal consideration beyond our species? The answer will test our appetites, markets, and laws, and reveal what kind of community we are willing to become.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List
