"A king is a thing men have made for their own sakes, for quietness sake. Just as in a family one man is appointed to buy the meat"

John Selden's quote, "A king is a thing men have produced their own sakes, for quietness sake. Simply as in a household one male is appointed to buy the meat", captures the practical rationale behind establishing hierarchical leadership, both in governance and within a family unit. His observation can be understood as an expedition of the social constructs people create to preserve order and effectiveness.

At its core, Selden suggests that the organization of monarchy-- or any form of management-- is designed not for the exaltation of the leader himself but as a functional need for social stability. The phrase "for their own sakes, for quietness sake" suggests that individuals collectively agree to designate a particular figure of authority to minimize mayhem, make it possible for smooth governance, and concentrate on their individual lives with comfort. By picking a king, society intends to ensure a degree of predictability and order, effectively outsourcing the intricacy of governance to one designated individual or body.

Selden draws a parallel in between a king's role which of a specific designated within a household to carry out a specific job, such as buying meat. This contrast highlights the essential requirement for department of responsibilities in any community, big or little. In a family, designating a single person to manage a useful job facilitates expertise and reduces the overhead of choices, guaranteeing things run efficiently. Likewise, a king is tasked with the detailed task of managing state affairs, essentially allowing society to focus on other individual or communal pursuits.

Additionally, Selden's analogy indicates a social contract where authority is given up exchange for viewed advantages-- in governance, the benefits are peace and order, while in a family, they might be performance and well-fed members. This department of labor, both in a household and a kingdom, is not simply useful but practically indispensable. Selden's reflection shows an early understanding of leadership as an essential construct developed by the individuals, for the people, embodying the timeless balance between authority and the cumulative good.