"According to my principles, every master has his true and certain value. Praise and criticism cannot change any of that. Only the work itself praises and criticizes the master, and therefore I leave to everyone his own value"
About this Quote
Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach, a pivotal bridge between the Baroque inheritance of his father and the emerging Classical idiom, argues that an artist’s worth is intrinsic and legible in the work itself. Public applause or censure are gusts of opinion; the enduring measure is the composition’s craft, coherence, and expressive power across time. By leaving to everyone his own value, he refuses partisan ranking and personal disparagement, trusting that the music itself will render the final judgment.
The stance reflects both temperament and circumstance. Working at Frederick the Great’s court in Berlin and later in Hamburg, C. P. E. Bach wrote in the empfindsamer Stil, a sensitive, volatile style that prized expressive nuance over rigid counterpoint. He was celebrated by some, doubted by others, and inevitably compared to his father, Johann Sebastian. His aesthetics often provoked controversy amid the broader struggle between the learned style and the galant. Rather than argue with critics, he points toward the score: the music either sustains feeling, logic, and invention or it does not.
This outlook aligns with his landmark Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments, where he stressed disciplined technique in the service of expression. Technique, for him, is not a display to impress judges but the means through which inner meaning becomes audible. If value resides in the work, then lasting worth cannot be inflated by praise nor diminished by fashion. Time, performance, and attentive listening will sift what endures from what merely dazzles.
There is also humility in the refusal to redistribute value, as if criticism could reassign artistic capital at will. Masters stand before their own work, not before tribunals of reputation. The principle quietly anticipates a modern idea of artistic autonomy: the work is the truest witness. Against the noise of polemics and celebrity, the music itself settles the account.
The stance reflects both temperament and circumstance. Working at Frederick the Great’s court in Berlin and later in Hamburg, C. P. E. Bach wrote in the empfindsamer Stil, a sensitive, volatile style that prized expressive nuance over rigid counterpoint. He was celebrated by some, doubted by others, and inevitably compared to his father, Johann Sebastian. His aesthetics often provoked controversy amid the broader struggle between the learned style and the galant. Rather than argue with critics, he points toward the score: the music either sustains feeling, logic, and invention or it does not.
This outlook aligns with his landmark Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments, where he stressed disciplined technique in the service of expression. Technique, for him, is not a display to impress judges but the means through which inner meaning becomes audible. If value resides in the work, then lasting worth cannot be inflated by praise nor diminished by fashion. Time, performance, and attentive listening will sift what endures from what merely dazzles.
There is also humility in the refusal to redistribute value, as if criticism could reassign artistic capital at will. Masters stand before their own work, not before tribunals of reputation. The principle quietly anticipates a modern idea of artistic autonomy: the work is the truest witness. Against the noise of polemics and celebrity, the music itself settles the account.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Carl
Add to List









