"After developing a primitive theory (1968) I therefore did not pursue this subject. However, the work was taken up by others and in 1974 the first experiments were done in the ISR"
About this Quote
There is a particular kind of confidence that only shows up as understatement, and Simon van der Meer wields it like a scalpel. “After developing a primitive theory (1968) I therefore did not pursue this subject” reads almost comically modest: primitive, therefore I stopped. In most fields that would be a shrug. In high-energy physics, it’s a quiet admission of how brutally selective the discipline is. Ideas aren’t treasured for their charm; they’re stress-tested, shelved, or handed off without sentiment.
The subtext is a portrait of scientific progress as relay race, not hero narrative. Van der Meer sketches a timeline where personal authorship matters less than institutional momentum: a thought in 1968, other hands picking it up, experiments finally landing in 1974 at the ISR (CERN’s Intersecting Storage Rings, a machine built to collide beams and make theory answerable to data). The “however” doesn’t reclaim credit so much as mark the moment a private speculation becomes public infrastructure.
Intent-wise, the quote is a deliberately narrow accounting: no grand claims, no mythology, just provenance. That restraint is its rhetorical power. It communicates seriousness, but also a kind of ethical posture: ideas are provisional, and ego is a poor measuring device. The real punchline is implied: what he calls “primitive” was still fertile enough to become experiment-worthy. In a field obsessed with precision, the understatement lands as the most credible form of pride.
The subtext is a portrait of scientific progress as relay race, not hero narrative. Van der Meer sketches a timeline where personal authorship matters less than institutional momentum: a thought in 1968, other hands picking it up, experiments finally landing in 1974 at the ISR (CERN’s Intersecting Storage Rings, a machine built to collide beams and make theory answerable to data). The “however” doesn’t reclaim credit so much as mark the moment a private speculation becomes public infrastructure.
Intent-wise, the quote is a deliberately narrow accounting: no grand claims, no mythology, just provenance. That restraint is its rhetorical power. It communicates seriousness, but also a kind of ethical posture: ideas are provisional, and ego is a poor measuring device. The real punchline is implied: what he calls “primitive” was still fertile enough to become experiment-worthy. In a field obsessed with precision, the understatement lands as the most credible form of pride.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Simon van der Meer, Nobel Lecture "Stochastic Cooling and the Accumulation of Antiprotons", Nobel Prize in Physics 1984 — lecture text (1984) where he recounts developing a primitive theory in 1968 and ISR experiments in 1974. |
More Quotes by Simon
Add to List
